Effects of local handwashing agents on microbial contamination of the hands in a rural setting in Northwest Ethiopia: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of handwashing with water and wood ash in reducing faecal contamination of the hands.DesignA cluster randomised controlled trial was employed with two arms: handwashing with water and wood ash versus handwashing with water alone.SettingRural households of East Dembiya District, Central Gondar Zone, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia.Participants440 mothers and caregivers of children younger than 5 years assigned (1:1, 220 in each group) in clusters, with buffer zones between each cluster.InterventionHealth education on effective handwashing was given to the intervention and control groups. Participants in the intervention group used wood ash of the same quantity (ie, one closed palm).Outcome measuresThe primary outcome was microbial contamination of the hands, measured by means of Escherichia coli counts before and after handwashing.ResultsAt baseline, 75.9% and 67.7% of the participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively, had dirt on their fingernails, and the hands of all participants in both groups were contaminated with E. coli. The mean E. coli counts recovered at baseline were 3.07 log10 colony forming unit (CFU)/swab in the intervention group and 3.03 log10 CFU/swab in the control group, while at endline it was 1.4 log10 CFU/swab in the intervention group and 3.02 log10 CFU/swab in the control group. The mean E.coli counts was reduced by 1.65 log10 due to the intervention (difference-in-differences: β= −1.65, 95% CI= −1.84 to –1.46).ConclusionTwo-thirds of the swab samples tested positive for E. coli after handwashing with water and wood ash, which indicates wood ash is not very effective in terms of completely removing micro-organisms on the hands. However, wood ash was significantly better than water alone in reducing the concentration of faecal coliform organisms on the hands. Local health authorities should primarily promote handwashing with soap. However, in the absence of soap, use of wood ash over water alone might be appropriate.Trial registration numberPACTR202011855730652.

Microbiota profiling on veterinary faculty restroom surfaces and source tracking

“…In general, the microbiota of restroom environments is intimately linked to the human microbiome. Different feeding patterns, hands, and skin lead to the establishment of microbial profiles, which also were described in other studies (25,26,27). The idea to define the bacterial biotope was already explored (28), especially in restrooms (7,29).…”

Assessment of handwashing impact on detection of SARS-CoV-2, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli on hands in rural and urban settings of Côte d’Ivoire during COVID-19 pandemic

“…This finding could be explained by the fact that in areas where human and animal excreta are disposed in an unhygienic way, hands are more contaminated. It is typically the case of rural area where animal husbandry within the household environment is common and exposure to human and animal faeces is of particular concern [ 50 ].…”

“…Interactions between bacteria, skin cells and immune cells can repair and reinforce the barrier formed by the skin and the disruption of this interaction can leave the skin susceptible to eczema and skin allergies, or interfere with the healing of people with diabetic ulcers [ 14 ]. A causal link exists between hand hygiene and infection transmission [ 15 ].…”

Profiles of bacteria isolates and their antimicrobial resistance pattern among housemaids working in communal living residences in Jimma City, Ethiopia

“…De Alwis and colleagues revealed that contaminated surfaces such as toilets and washrooms could be the sources of contamination of the hands when a person comes into contact [ 36 ]. In addition, the microbial contamination of hands could be due to the ineffectiveness of handwashing agents [ 40 ]. Moreover, ignorance of handwashing with soap, touching dirty materials, and long fingernails [ 12 , 41 ].…”