2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-017-0288-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Local Shoreline and Subestuary Watershed Condition on Waterbird Community Integrity: Influences of Geospatial Scale and Season in the Chesapeake Bay

Abstract: In many coastal regions throughout the world, there is increasing pressure to harden shorelines to protect human infrastructures against sea level rise, storm surge, and erosion. This study examines waterbird community integrity in relation to shoreline hardening and land use characteristics at three geospatial scales: (1) the shoreline scale characterized by seven shoreline types: bulkhead, riprap, developed, natural marsh, Phragmites-dominated marsh, sandy beach, and forest; (2) the local subestuary landscap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Phragmites has invaded natural wetlands along the US east coast (Chambers et al 1999) and in the continental US (Kulmatiski et al 2010;Larson et al 2011;Bourgeau-Chavez et al 2013). Invasion by Phragmites can negatively impact wetland structure and function by altering dynamics in fish (Jones et al 2014; Jones and Able 2015) and bird (Prosser et al 2017, this issue) communities. However, the consequences of invasion may not all be negative because Phragmites patches are not biological deserts, especially for animals (Kiviat 2013;Dibble and Meyerson 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Shoreline Armoring and Land Use On Tidal Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Phragmites has invaded natural wetlands along the US east coast (Chambers et al 1999) and in the continental US (Kulmatiski et al 2010;Larson et al 2011;Bourgeau-Chavez et al 2013). Invasion by Phragmites can negatively impact wetland structure and function by altering dynamics in fish (Jones et al 2014; Jones and Able 2015) and bird (Prosser et al 2017, this issue) communities. However, the consequences of invasion may not all be negative because Phragmites patches are not biological deserts, especially for animals (Kiviat 2013;Dibble and Meyerson 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Shoreline Armoring and Land Use On Tidal Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can add sediments, nutrients, pesticides, and contaminants to water (Jordan et al 1997;Paul and Meyer 2001;Gregg et al 2015). This can negatively impact benthic invertebrates (Hale et al 2004;King et al 2005), fish (Sanger et al 2004), and waterbird communities (DeLuca et al 2008;Prosser et al 2017). Pollutants can reduce abundance, diversity, and trophic complexity of benthic species in favor of small, short-lived, opportunistic species, such as deposit-feeding polychaetes (Pearson and Rosenberg 1978;Warwick and Clarke 1993;Inglis and Kross 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 63 different species of water birds require those transitions for feeding, mating and nesting along the shores of the Bay’s tributaries. As little as 5% shoreline hardening significantly reduces water bird habitat and counts (Prosser et al 2017 ). As of 2016, 18% of the shoreline of the Bay and its major tributaries had been hardened, substantially reducing habitat (Mitchell 2016 ).…”
Section: Coastal Flooding Destroys Habitatmentioning
confidence: 99%