2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02217-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of long-term microgravity exposure on cancellous and cortical weight-bearing bones of cosmonauts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

18
413
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 652 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
18
413
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using calcium kinetics, site-specific bone densitometry and bone turnover markers document a net loss of bone mineral in the gravitationally-unloaded skeleton of crew members who had flown either on Skylab (28, 56 and 84 days) or on long-duration missions (>4 months) aboard the Russian Mir spacecraft and the International Space Station (ISS) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies using calcium kinetics, site-specific bone densitometry and bone turnover markers document a net loss of bone mineral in the gravitationally-unloaded skeleton of crew members who had flown either on Skylab (28, 56 and 84 days) or on long-duration missions (>4 months) aboard the Russian Mir spacecraft and the International Space Station (ISS) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Skylab missions of the 1970's, measurements of bone mineral and bone mineral density had been used to evaluate the effects of spaceflight on the skeleton [4,5,8,9]. More recently, QCT scans of long-duration crew members was used to evaluate changes in mineral density and in hip structure after spaceflight [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from Skylab and Mir missions show that astronauts continue to lose bone despite participation in vigorous in-flight exercise protocols [11,26,35,41]. The inflight exercise program on early International Space Station (ISS) flights was also not successful at mitigating weightlessness-induced bone loss [25], although exercise hardware availability in those missions was inconsistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ± 3 The loss of bone mineral from the skeleton has been di cult to counter in microgravitational environments, such as spinal cord injury, 4 ± 7 bedrest, 8 ± 10 and space¯ight. 11,12 Under these conditions the loss of bone mass is more pronounced in the lower, weight-bearing, limbs and remains relatively unchanged in the trunk. In spinal cord injured (SCI) however, demineralisation is also in¯uenced by the level and completeness of the spinal cord lesion, and duration of injury (DOI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 ± 23 However, results of load-bearing exercise in a microgravitational environment have been equivocal. 11,12,20,21,24,25 The purpose of this study was to compare bone mineral density of the total body, upper limbs, lower limbs, hip, and spine regions in a group of very active spinal cord injured adult males with values obtained in active able-bodied controls, carefully matched for age, height, and weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%