2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-0872-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of long-term use of macrolides in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits and safety of the long-term use of macrolides in patients with non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis.MethodsEmbase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception up to March 2014. The primary outcome was the improvement of exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Secondary endpoints included changes of microbiology, lung function, quality of life, sputum volume, adverse events and macrolide resistan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We analysed whether the positive effect on reducing exacerbations was dependent on route of administration (oral or inhaled) and if on long-term oral antibiotics whether there was different efficacy if on long-term macrolide therapy or not, but this review showed no significant differences; however, there have been no head to head trials comparing inhaled antibiotics versus oral antibiotics. Similar to Fan et al ,50 there was increased diarrhoea with long-term macrolide therapy. It is well recognised that inhaled therapies can lead to chest pain, wheeze and breathlessness due to local bronchospasm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We analysed whether the positive effect on reducing exacerbations was dependent on route of administration (oral or inhaled) and if on long-term oral antibiotics whether there was different efficacy if on long-term macrolide therapy or not, but this review showed no significant differences; however, there have been no head to head trials comparing inhaled antibiotics versus oral antibiotics. Similar to Fan et al ,50 there was increased diarrhoea with long-term macrolide therapy. It is well recognised that inhaled therapies can lead to chest pain, wheeze and breathlessness due to local bronchospasm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The use of macrolide antibiotics is associated with a comparatively low risk of Clostridium difficile infection (30), and maintenance treatment with macrolides has been suggested for patients with frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (31), cystic fibrosis (32), and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (33). Yet for the treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism, the potential induction of pathogen resistance through antibiotic treatment or increased gastrointestinal side effects through motilide activity would not be desired.…”
Section: L168rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most studied macrolide for bronchiectasis treatment is azithromycin, for which regimens include 250 mg daily or 500 mg three days a week, but clarithromycin and erythromycin have also been used with success. 101-103 …”
Section: Pulmonary Infections In Padmentioning
confidence: 99%