Effects of Lysozyme Dimer on Humoral Response to Sheep Erythrocytes in Non‐treated and Cyclophosphamide‐Immunosuppressed Mice

Abstract

The effects of lysozyme dimer on humoral response to sheep erythrocytes (SRBC) and restoration of the response impaired by a single cyclophosphamide dose (200 mg/kg) were tested on mice. The effect of lysozyme dimer on the humoral response to SRBC in non-treated with cyclophosphamide mice was determined in relation to doses (0.2, 2, 20 o r 200 pg/kg) and the time of the drug administration with respect to the antigen before or after SRBC immunization. Moreover, the effect of lysozyme dimer on the humoral response in cyclophosphamide-treated mice was studied depending on the dose applied and time of exposure to the drug in relation to SRBC. It has been found that lysozyme dimer potentiates the humoral response to SRBC in mice, resulting in an increased number of splenocytes producing haemolytic antibodies (FFC) and the total and 2-mercaptoethanol resistant level of anti-SRBC antibodies. A single exposure to lysozyme dimer gave the strongest stimulating action on SRBC when the doses of 2 or 20 pg/kg were administered 2 h prior to the antigen. The potentiating effect of the drug was reduced when it was administered 24 h before the antigen and also when single doses were as high as 200 pg/kg and as low as 2 pg/kg. Exposure to four doses of lysozyme dmer at 24 h intervals was more activating than a single injection. A strong potentiating effect on the specific response to SRBC was noted after four injections of lysozyme dimer at doses from 0.2 to 20 pg/kg. The effect of the drug did not depend on the time of exposure to the antigen. It has also been found that lysozyme dimer significantly reduces the suppressive effect of a high cyclophosphamide dose (200 mg/kg) on the humoral response of SRBCimmunized mice. The protective action of lysozyme dimer was dose-and time-dependent. The strongest protection was observed after three doses of 20 pg/kg administered prior to pharmacological immunosuppression. Reduction in the dose to 2 pg/kg and shorter treatment resulted in reduced protective effects. We have also found that the protective action of three doses of lysozyme dimer (2 or 20 pg/kg each) administered between cyclophosphamide injection and the antigen, or after antigen administration is weaker than such a treatment prior to cyclophosphamide immunosuppression.