1990
DOI: 10.1109/20.50550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of machining on magnetic properties of Nd-Fe-B system sintered magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23], and they are marked with black squares. The decrease in polarization at the right side of the curves was caused by the demagnetization of the areas at the surface that exhibited a strongly reduced coercivity compared to those of the bulk type [24][25][26]. In Figure 3, the magnetic viscosity parameter S v , which is dependent on the internal magnetic field, is shown for the selected temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[23], and they are marked with black squares. The decrease in polarization at the right side of the curves was caused by the demagnetization of the areas at the surface that exhibited a strongly reduced coercivity compared to those of the bulk type [24][25][26]. In Figure 3, the magnetic viscosity parameter S v , which is dependent on the internal magnetic field, is shown for the selected temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respective positions for the demagnetizing field were determined in accordance with [ 23 ], and they are marked with black squares. The decrease in polarization at the right side of the curves was caused by the demagnetization of the areas at the surface that exhibited a strongly reduced coercivity compared to those of the bulk type [ 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the material itself, N55 has a nonlinear B–H curve in the 2nd quadrant, while N48SH and SmCo30 have linear B–H curves in the 2nd and even in part of the 3rd quadrant. SmCo30 was tested so that the surface degradation can be excluded, which may be more obvious for some small or thin Nd–Fe–B magnets 9 .…”
Section: Experiments Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the magnetization distribution before cutting was estimated using the magnetic simulation software JMAG 31) to compensate for the demagnetizing field due to the shape change. 8) In this method, the main factor of the evaluation uncertainty was the sample volume. Because the accuracy of the cutting process was approximately ±1 vol%, the evaluation uncertainty of the magnetization was also deduced to be ±10%.…”
Section: Destructive Inspection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7) The smaller the cutting size of the magnet, the worse the deterioration. 8) Therefore, a nondestructive measurement method is required to measure the magnetization distribution inside a magnet with a high accuracy and spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%