1988
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.102.2.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of male social status on reproductive success and on behavior in mice (Mus musculus).

Abstract: Differences in reproduction as well as in behavior in the presence of females were evaluated according to dominant and subordinate male rank in albino mice, in the temporary absence of each male's antagonist. Dominant males reproduced more successfully than subordinate males. Subordinate males were generally inactive, except for displacement activities, during the first 15 min they were exposed to female partners. These findings suggest that mechanisms other than male-male interference or mating order may be o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, because the males in the first experiment were housed in groups of four until two or three days prior to restricted female access, many of males used in this study were likely of subordinate social status. Previous research suggests that if a subordinate male is cohabitated with a dominant male, the subordinate male decreases investigation and sexual interaction with a female as the period of cohabitation increases, despite the fact that the dominant male is not present for these interactions [25]. Differences in reproductive success between subordinate and dominant males were observed to become negligible after one to three weeks of single-housing [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, because the males in the first experiment were housed in groups of four until two or three days prior to restricted female access, many of males used in this study were likely of subordinate social status. Previous research suggests that if a subordinate male is cohabitated with a dominant male, the subordinate male decreases investigation and sexual interaction with a female as the period of cohabitation increases, despite the fact that the dominant male is not present for these interactions [25]. Differences in reproductive success between subordinate and dominant males were observed to become negligible after one to three weeks of single-housing [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous research suggests that if a subordinate male is cohabitated with a dominant male, the subordinate male decreases investigation and sexual interaction with a female as the period of cohabitation increases, despite the fact that the dominant male is not present for these interactions [25]. Differences in reproductive success between subordinate and dominant males were observed to become negligible after one to three weeks of single-housing [25]. For restricted social interaction experiment #2, the males were not housed with other males for at least nine days prior to the restricted female access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is possible an increase in androgen receptor expression increases mate preference and/or increases the probability of copulation for dominant animals. Sexual behavior and dominance status are closely associated in males, with dominant animals showing increased sexual behavior in a variety of species (Blanchard and Blanchard, 1989; D’Amato, 1988; Dewsbury, 1988; Perret, 1992; Perret, 1977). Interestingly, female Syrian hamsters prefer dominant males over subordinates in a mate choice test (Brown et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socially-defeated animals interact less with unfamiliar animals (Frischknecht et al, 1982; Kudryavtseva et al, 1991; Kudryavtseva, 1994; Meerlo, Overkamp, Daan, et al, 1996; Huhman et al, 2003), engage in few reproductive activities (Kahn, 1961; D'Amato, 1988; Blanchard&Blanchard, 1989;Yoshimura&Kimura, 1991; Foxet al, 1997) and readily display defensive and submissive postures and vocal signals (Van de Poll et al, 1982; Siegfried et al, 1984; Puglisi-Allegra & Cabib, 1988; van der Poel & Miczek, 1991; Potegal et al, 1993). In general, defeated animals are less active, and explore, forage, eat and drink less (Raab et al, 1986; Meerlo, Overkamp, Benning, et al, 1996; Meerlo, Overkamp, Daan et al, 1996; Flügge et al, 1998).…”
Section: Which Types Of Social Stress?mentioning
confidence: 99%