Effects of mandibular protraction appliance associated to fixed appliance in adults

Furquim, Bruno D’Aurea; Henriques, José Fernando Castanha; Janson, Guilherme; Siqueira, Danilo Furquim; Furquim, Laurindo Zanco

doi:10.1590/s2176-94512013000500009

Cited by 10 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Within the field of dentoskeletal relationships, it was important to note that there was no significant restriction of maxillary molar mesialization. This was also be observed in other studies that showed the improvement in Class II would occur to a larger extent by mesialization of the mandibular molar 9,13 and mild limitation of anterior displacement of the maxillary first molars 9,13 . According to the methodology used, there was significant restriction of maxillary anterior displacement, a restriction that was also highlighted in another study 25 . However, in a comparative study between MPA, Jasper Jumper and a Class II control group, there was no significant restriction of anterior maxillary growth in comparison with the control group 19 , and the same result was found in another study 24 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

“…The MPA improved the molar ratio and increased the interincisive angle, which could be explained by lingualization of the maxillary incisors 10,25 and vestibularization of the mandibular incisors 13,24 . According to the original proposal of the MPA, the main concern related to mandibular advancement was to maintain the inclination of the mandibular incisors 11,12 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…To evaluate the results, we did not consider a control group because the increments were substantiated by the author of the analysis 20 , and these (values) showed that the variables of this study incorporated the changes that would occur with the normal growth of the individual; that is, the results of this study did not occur without the action of the MPA in correction of the sagittal discrepancy. Moreover, it is possible to observe other studies that have evaluated the effects of mandibular protraction in the treatment of Class II, without including a control group in the study 4,13,16,24 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several authors have studied the effects of Class II treatment by means of cephalometric evaluation 13,14 , including cephalometric changes in MPA treatment 3,13,15 but there is a scarcity of studies in the literature assessing the effects of mandibular protraction by the Ricketts Analysis. Those that used Ricketts, only evaluated alterations in the profile, mesialization of the first molars, and verified the upper airway space [16][17][18] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Dentoskeletal and aesthetic effects of mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) using Ricketts analysis

Chacón

Henriques

Filho

et al. 2018

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study was designed to evaluate the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of mandibular deficiency treatment with the mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) using 12 factors of the Ricketts analysis. Material and method This cross-sectional retrospective study sample consisted of a group (n = 27), with Class II malocclusion, convex facial profile, increased horizontal trespass and mandibular deficiency, with initial mean age of 12.27 and final of 15.18 years, treated with fixed appliance combined with the MPA, in an average time of 2.9 years. Initial and final radiographs were investigated using Ricketts analysis. The dependent t-test was used to compare the initial and final phases of the MPA group, with a significance level of 5%. Result Statistically significant differences were observed for dental changes such as retrusion (p=0.000) and palatal inclination of the maxillary incisors (p=0.000); protrusion (p=0.000) and buccal inclination of the mandibular incisors (p=0.000); increased interincisal angle (p=0.002) and improved molar ratio (p=0.003). There was also a restriction of the anterior displacement of the maxilla (p=0.000) and a decrease in the mandibular plane angle (p=0.024). The variable inferior labial protrusion with significance (p=0.000), reiterated the improvement in the profile. Conclusion The effects of MPA on correction of malocclusion Class II, verified by Ricketts analysis occurred predominantly by dentoalveolar changes, decrease in the Mandibular Plane Angle, and restriction of anterior displacement of the maxilla, which contributed to the improvement in the patient's profile.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dentoskeletal and aesthetic effects of mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) using Ricketts analysis

Chacón

Henriques

Filho

et al. 2018

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite MPA's widespread use in South America, there are only a few reports on its effects (5,8,9) at different stages of dentofacial development. Furthermore, these reports do not identify changes caused by MPA according to dentofacial development, an important variable associated with craniofacial changes produced by orthopedic appliances (1).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mandibular Protraction Appliance Effects in Class II Malocclusion in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) for treating mild to moderate Class II malocclusion at different stages of dentofacial development. Lateral radiographs were evaluated before (T0) and at the end (T1) of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance associated with MPA. Sixty-five consecutively treated patients were divided according to the stage of dentofacial development: 21 children in late mixed dentition, 22 adolescents and 22 young adults with full permanent dentition. The differences between and within groups were analyzed by MANOVA at p<0.05. The correction of anteroposterior discrepancy (Wits) was significantly reduced in all development stages (p<0.01), with no difference between groups. Class II was corrected predominantly by dental changes in the mandibular arch, with accentuated proclination of the mandibular incisors and mesial displacement of mandibular molars. The MPA had no skeletal effects in any of the groups, except for a mild reduction of SNA (p=0.018) and ANB angles (p<0.0001) among the mixed dentition children. With regard to soft-tissue profile, facial convexity decreased significantly in all groups (p<0.01). In conclusion, the MPA associated with fixed appliance corrected the Class II occlusion, basically by a mandibular arch protrusion. A mild skeletal maxillary change was significant only when this treatment protocol began during mixed dentition.

show abstract

A finite element analysis of the effects of semipontic design on tooth movement during mesialization of the mandibular second molar with clear aligners

Koru Akan,

Hancıoğlu Kircelli,

Paşaoğlu Bozkurt

et al. 2024

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effects of mandibular protraction appliance associated to fixed appliance in adults

Cited by 10 publications

References 27 publications

Dentoskeletal and aesthetic effects of mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) using Ricketts analysis

Dentoskeletal and aesthetic effects of mandibular protraction appliance (MPA) using Ricketts analysis

Mandibular Protraction Appliance Effects in Class II Malocclusion in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults

A finite element analysis of the effects of semipontic design on tooth movement during mesialization of the mandibular second molar with clear aligners

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About