2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Maternal Basking and Food Quantity during Gestation Provide Evidence for the Selective Advantage of Matrotrophy in a Viviparous Lizard

Abstract: The evolution of matrotrophy (i.e., direct supply of nutrients by the mother during gestation) may be associated with high maternal energy availability during gestation. However, we lack knowledge about the selective advantages of matrotrophic viviparity (live-bearing) in reptiles. In reptiles, the interaction between body temperature and food intake affect maternal net energy gain. In the present study, we examined the effects of basking and food availability (2 by 2 factorial design) during gestation on offs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, previous measurements of matrotrophy index, which were calculated from captive females with abundant food (e.g., Stewart and Thompson 1993;Thompson et al 1999bThompson et al , 2001, may not be representative of placentotrophy in wild populations. Instead, individuals likely vary widely in placentotrophic provisioning depending on their foraging success (and body temperature; Itonaga et al 2012b) during gestation. Our data clearly show that differences in offspring size due to differing feeding regimes in placentotrophic skinks (e.g., Shine and Downes 1999;Itonaga et al 2012b) are caused by differences in placental transport of protein, lipid, and energy during gestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, previous measurements of matrotrophy index, which were calculated from captive females with abundant food (e.g., Stewart and Thompson 1993;Thompson et al 1999bThompson et al , 2001, may not be representative of placentotrophy in wild populations. Instead, individuals likely vary widely in placentotrophic provisioning depending on their foraging success (and body temperature; Itonaga et al 2012b) during gestation. Our data clearly show that differences in offspring size due to differing feeding regimes in placentotrophic skinks (e.g., Shine and Downes 1999;Itonaga et al 2012b) are caused by differences in placental transport of protein, lipid, and energy during gestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, individuals likely vary widely in placentotrophic provisioning depending on their foraging success (and body temperature; Itonaga et al 2012b) during gestation. Our data clearly show that differences in offspring size due to differing feeding regimes in placentotrophic skinks (e.g., Shine and Downes 1999;Itonaga et al 2012b) are caused by differences in placental transport of protein, lipid, and energy during gestation. In particular, offspring from high-food treatments contained nearly twice as much protein as did freshly ovulated eggs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Placental structure, function, and development have been studied in detail in Pseudemoia (Stewart and Thompson, , ; Adams et al, ; for summaries, see Stewart and Thompson, ; Stewart and Blackburn, ). At least three of the six species are modestly placentotrophic, and the amount of nutrient transfer is facultatively regulated (Thompson et al, , , ; Itonaga et al, , ; van Dyke et al, 2014a). Despite modest differences in the degree of placentotrophy, placentation is similar in the studied species, at least at the level of light microscopy.…”
Section: Morphological Specializations For Placentotrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various studies attempt to identify the adaptive significance of maternal effects in diverse organisms, from plants to invertebrates to vertebrates (Galloway ; Steiger et al . ; Donelson, Mccormick & Munday ; Itonaga, Jones & Wapstra ; Araminaite et al . ; Henderson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%