1989
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(89)90392-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of matrix microstructure and particle distribution on fracture of an aluminum metal matrix composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] A number of different approaches have been reported on the quantitative study of the reinforcement distribution in a composite such as the Dirichlet tessellation method, [22] the average inter-particle spacing or the mean free path, [23] the nearest and near neighbor distances, [24] the local area fraction, [24] and the radial distribution function. [21] This research has applied the widely accepted quadrat method for quantitatively analysis.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] A number of different approaches have been reported on the quantitative study of the reinforcement distribution in a composite such as the Dirichlet tessellation method, [22] the average inter-particle spacing or the mean free path, [23] the nearest and near neighbor distances, [24] the local area fraction, [24] and the radial distribution function. [21] This research has applied the widely accepted quadrat method for quantitatively analysis.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had been proved that alumina particlesc compounds could effectively improve the properties of Al-MMCs [7,[42][43]. In an Al-based composites reinforced with TiB 2 and Al 2 O 3 particulates, the yield strength of 545 MPa and tensile strength of 638 MPa were achieved, which were higher 9 and 6.8 times than that of pure Al.…”
Section: Alumina Particlesc Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There are a few reinforced materials, such as silicon carbide, aluminum oxide, the quasicrystalline phase, graphite, and so on [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] in the form of particles or whiskers that can be used for the reinforcement of Al-MMCs because of their improved physical and mechanical properties [3,7]. Among them, Al 2 O 3 are characterized by high stable, inert and thermal stability, which make it become one of the most popular reinforcement phases and have gained much attentions [3,6,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mismatches can induce large stresses within the inclusions or at the matrix-inclusion interfaces [10,11]. A number of failure modes in MMCs have been reported in the past, including matrix/particle debonding [12][13][14][15][16], particle cracking [11,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and ductile failure in the matrix [25,26]. The elastic modulus, flow stress and ductility of MMCs are found to drop significantly as soon as such failures occur [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%