2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of metal content on activity and stability of Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts for CO2 reforming of CH4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
130
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
130
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was explained by synergetic interactions between Ni and Co, which resulted in the formation of highly dispersed small Ni crystallites. On the contrary, Zhang et al [98] reported the best performance of Ni-Co hydrotalcite-derived catalysts for Ni/Co molar ratios close to unity. The authors, however, noted that the amount of metals had also an effect on the catalyst performance, and catalysts with low content of Ni (1.83-3.61 wt %) and Co (2.76-4.43 wt %) showed better performance.…”
Section: Other Promotersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was explained by synergetic interactions between Ni and Co, which resulted in the formation of highly dispersed small Ni crystallites. On the contrary, Zhang et al [98] reported the best performance of Ni-Co hydrotalcite-derived catalysts for Ni/Co molar ratios close to unity. The authors, however, noted that the amount of metals had also an effect on the catalyst performance, and catalysts with low content of Ni (1.83-3.61 wt %) and Co (2.76-4.43 wt %) showed better performance.…”
Section: Other Promotersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They reported that increased metal content enhanced the CO 2 conversion and very low carbon deposits were formed, albeit that they used low metal concentrations (<4 wt.%). Zhang et al [32] also reported that lower Ni-Co content catalysts had lower carbon deposition, but higher Ni-Co content produced significant carbon deposition when the catalysts were used over extended periods (~250 h). For the work reported here, there was no carbon deposition at the higher Co content NiCo-Al catalyst.…”
Section: Experimental Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRD pattern of spent Ni/Mg.Al.550 ( Figure 2a) displays a similar profile as the fresh sample, proving the stability of the material during the reaction. This result is probably due to the incorporation of Ni into the solid solution or/and the MgAl2O4 spinel framework since such stable phases prevent the structural transformation at the high reaction temperature [17,18,21]. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms together with the BJH (Barrett-Joyner-Halenda) pore size distributions (PSD) of the Mg.Al.550.800 support and corresponding Ni catalysts are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%