1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00433499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of methamphetamine on novelty-seeking behaviour by mice

Abstract: The effects of several doses from 0.125-3 mg/kg of methamphetamine on the novelty-seeking behaviour of male Swiss albino mice were studied. Methamphetamine induced a dose-dependent inhibition of novelty preference. Furthermore, a dose of methamphetamine (1 mg/kg) which strongly decreased novelty preference in naive mice induced a significantly lower decrease in exploration of subjects previously exposed to novelty. These data provide some support for Berlyne's (1967) suggestion that amphetamine has a disruptiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
21
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected on the basis of previous reports (Misslin and Ropartz 1981;Bardo et al 1996; Laviola and Adriani 1998), data from Experiment 1 indicated that, following the opening of a partition, all subjects showed a novelty-induced arousal as well as a clear-cut preference for the novel environment. Important carry-over effects of the manipulation of weaning time were found, in that the profile exhibited by Wean-15 mice consisted of a quick attraction for the novel environment, which was followed by a monotonic habituation trend.…”
Section: Novelty Seeking and Novelty-induced Arousalsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected on the basis of previous reports (Misslin and Ropartz 1981;Bardo et al 1996; Laviola and Adriani 1998), data from Experiment 1 indicated that, following the opening of a partition, all subjects showed a novelty-induced arousal as well as a clear-cut preference for the novel environment. Important carry-over effects of the manipulation of weaning time were found, in that the profile exhibited by Wean-15 mice consisted of a quick attraction for the novel environment, which was followed by a monotonic habituation trend.…”
Section: Novelty Seeking and Novelty-induced Arousalsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In fact, Wean-27 mice spent overall more time in the novel environment than the regular-weaning control group. Hence, a delay in weaning age resulted in adult individuals exhibiting a longer exploration of the novel environment.It has been reported that levels of locomotion expressed during the exploration of the novel compartment are lower than those exhibited in the familiar one; that is, a slight behavioral inhibition is usually associated with a novel environment (Misslin and Ropartz 1981;Bardo et al 1996;Laviola and Adriani 1998). Indeed, during exploration of a novel environment, mice are reported to express both approach (sniffing and smelling) and avoidance (stretched attend, stretched advance) reactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the novelty-seeking test, exploratory activity and emotional reactivity represent two different dimensions based on different mechanisms (Zimmermann et al 2001). A profile of hyperlocomotion during exploration of novel environments has been proposed as an index of novelty-induced stress (Exner and Clark 1993;Misslin and Ropartz 1981;Misslin et al 1982). Present data may suggest that prenatal treatment with BPA produced rats that were more likely to experience noveltyinduced stress during adolescence or, alternatively, a slowing down of the process of habituation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The latter is indeed characterized by the onset of prominent hormonal regulation. For this reason, BPA-exposed rats of both sexes were assessed in a novelty preference test (Bardo et al 1988;Misslin and Ropartz 1981) during adolescence (Spear and Brake 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amphetamine reduces exploration of novel environments in situations lacking programmed reinforcement (Hughes and Greig, 1976;Kumar, 1969Kumar, , 1971Misslin and Ropartz, 1981;Robbins and Iversen, 1973). In such situations, exploration does not interfere with goal-directed behavior and cannot be considered equivalent to distraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%