2010
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of MHC Class I Alleles on Licensing of Ly49A+ NK Cells

Abstract: Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
72
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the lack of licensing of Ly49G 129 seen previously is due to H-2D b being a weak self-educator as shown in splenocyte rejection assays using H-2K b2/2 , H-2D b2/2 , or H-2K b2/2 H-2D b2/2 mice as donors (14,29). Furthermore, this hypothesis agrees with the observations that Ly49A can bind to H-2D b when the L chain is of mouse origin (24), but that Ly49A + NK cell subsets in H-2 b background mice produce little if any IFN-g upon stimulation, compared with Ly49A + subsets in H-2 d background mice (30); H-2D d is a strong ligand for Ly49A (31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is possible that the lack of licensing of Ly49G 129 seen previously is due to H-2D b being a weak self-educator as shown in splenocyte rejection assays using H-2K b2/2 , H-2D b2/2 , or H-2K b2/2 H-2D b2/2 mice as donors (14,29). Furthermore, this hypothesis agrees with the observations that Ly49A can bind to H-2D b when the L chain is of mouse origin (24), but that Ly49A + NK cell subsets in H-2 b background mice produce little if any IFN-g upon stimulation, compared with Ly49A + subsets in H-2 d background mice (30); H-2D d is a strong ligand for Ly49A (31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A recent study in which the responsiveness of NK cells in mice with hemi-or homozygous expression of D d , similar to our mice, presented a different conclusion, although a trend toward stronger IFN-g responses in Ly49A + cells was described in homozygous mice (38). There could be several reasons for the discrepant results, including age and housing conditions of the mice, the stimulus used (antiNKp46 versus anti-NK1.1), and the type of statistical test applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…More specific differences in the experimental outset may also play a role. For example, for Ly49 subset identification, Jonsson et al (38) included Abs to Ly49C/I/F/G2 and NKG2A in one dump channel to exclude NK cells expressing any of these receptors. In our experience, this method is less reliable as a strategy to separate NK cell subsets than unique fluorescent markings of each individual receptor in a multicolor setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging evidence indicate that effector inhibition is not only the recruitment of a tyrosine phosphatase but also the recruitment of a macromolecular complex that potentially could give rise to different outcomes depending on the context (34). Indeed, other studies suggest that signal strength through a given receptor could modulate the ability of an NK-cell receptor to give rise to the licensing effect and that signal strength required for the licensing effect is different from that required to produce inhibition (35). Therefore it is possible that Ly49A receptors with mutant stalks could alter the ability of the receptor to deliver the appropriate signal strength necessary for licensing to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%