2009
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2009.080107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Mist Netting on Reproductive Performance of Wrentits and Song Sparrows in Central Coastal California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While considerable work has been done to examine the efficacy of capturing different bird species using mist nets [18], [31], [76], [79] and their general safety [88], [89], to our knowledge this is the first study to compare the daily detection probability generated by passive (traditional set) mist-netting versus more active placement of nets in areas where birds simply do not have room to avoid them. Drop-netting over the side of a bridge is in many ways similar to flushing swallows into a set net, as the act of dropping the net over the side of a bridge startles the birds out of their nests and into the net.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While considerable work has been done to examine the efficacy of capturing different bird species using mist nets [18], [31], [76], [79] and their general safety [88], [89], to our knowledge this is the first study to compare the daily detection probability generated by passive (traditional set) mist-netting versus more active placement of nets in areas where birds simply do not have room to avoid them. Drop-netting over the side of a bridge is in many ways similar to flushing swallows into a set net, as the act of dropping the net over the side of a bridge startles the birds out of their nests and into the net.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1980, the entire study area has been intensively searched for color‐banded individuals, breeding territories, and nests, and all nests are monitored to determine their success or failure in fledging young (Geupel & DeSante, ; Chase et al ., ). Further details about the study area, flora, and field methods have been described elsewhere (Nur et al ., ; Jennings et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The study area, flora, and field methods have been described in detail elsewhere (Ballard et al 2004, Jennings et al 2009), and are summarized here. The study area, flora, and field methods have been described in detail elsewhere (Ballard et al 2004, Jennings et al 2009), and are summarized here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%