2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of mobile phone usage on sperm quality – No time-dependent relationship on usage: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the heterogeneity of the effect estimates, the I 2 statistics classification by Higgins et al (2003) was employed [ 15 ]. Heterogeneity was categorized as moderate ( I 2 -value 50–75%) or considerable ( I 2 -value > 75%), indicating significant heterogeneity [ 16 ]. If the heterogeneity exceeded 50%, the random effects method was used; otherwise, the fixed effects method was employed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the heterogeneity of the effect estimates, the I 2 statistics classification by Higgins et al (2003) was employed [ 15 ]. Heterogeneity was categorized as moderate ( I 2 -value 50–75%) or considerable ( I 2 -value > 75%), indicating significant heterogeneity [ 16 ]. If the heterogeneity exceeded 50%, the random effects method was used; otherwise, the fixed effects method was employed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the heterogeneity of effect estimates using the classification of I 2 statistics as outlined by Higgins et al 19 We considered an I 2 -value in the range of 50%-75% as indicative of moderate heterogeneity and an I 2 -value exceeding 75% as considerable heterogeneity. 20 In cases where heterogeneity exceeded 50%, we applied the random effects method; otherwise, we used the fixed effects method. The meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the Review Manager 5.4 software provided by Cochrane, with forest plots generated for a clear visualization of pooled ORs.…”
Section: Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wir untersuchten die Heterogenität der Effektschätzer mithilfe der Klassifikation der I 2 -Statistik gemäß der Publikation von Higgins et al 19 Dabei ordneten wir I 2 -Werte zwischen 50% und 75% als Zeichen einer moderaten Heterogenität ein, und I 2 -Werte über 75% als starke Heterogenität. 20 In Fällen mit einer Heterogenität über 50% wandten wir das Random-Effects-Modell an, ansonsten das Fixed-Effects-Modell. Die Metaanalyse wurde mit der Review Manager 5.4 -Software von Cochrane durchgeführt, mit Forest plots zur klaren Visualisierung der zusammengefassten OR.…”
Section: Datensyntheseunclassified