2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of modulators of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated neurotransmission on diazepam discrimination in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, both drug classes inhibit neurotransmission; NMDAR antagonists do so by blocking sodium and calcium influx into neurons, whereas benzodiazepines facilitate chloride ion entry (Haefely, Martin, Richards, & Schoch, 1993; Lodge & Johnson, 1990; Twyman, Rogers, & Macdonald, 1989). Second, NMDAR antagonists and benzodiazepines produce depressant actions on the central nervous system that include anticonvulsant and anxiolytic effects and muscle relaxation (Wiley & Balster, 2004; Willetts, Balster, & Leander, 1990). Whole-cell recordings from hippocampal neurons have shown that BZDs, like NMDAR antagonists, reduce NMDAR-mediated currents in hippocampal neurons (Van Sickle, Cox, Schak, Greenfield, & Tietz, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, both drug classes inhibit neurotransmission; NMDAR antagonists do so by blocking sodium and calcium influx into neurons, whereas benzodiazepines facilitate chloride ion entry (Haefely, Martin, Richards, & Schoch, 1993; Lodge & Johnson, 1990; Twyman, Rogers, & Macdonald, 1989). Second, NMDAR antagonists and benzodiazepines produce depressant actions on the central nervous system that include anticonvulsant and anxiolytic effects and muscle relaxation (Wiley & Balster, 2004; Willetts, Balster, & Leander, 1990). Whole-cell recordings from hippocampal neurons have shown that BZDs, like NMDAR antagonists, reduce NMDAR-mediated currents in hippocampal neurons (Van Sickle, Cox, Schak, Greenfield, & Tietz, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%