1994
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1994.371.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Mulch and Tunnel on the Yield and Harvesting Period of Cucumber and Squash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trend in yield were also reported by Singh and Kumar (2009). Sari et al (1994) reported similar findings in cucumber. Mulch increased the yield of crop plants by 7.2 % over non mulched plants.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Similar trend in yield were also reported by Singh and Kumar (2009). Sari et al (1994) reported similar findings in cucumber. Mulch increased the yield of crop plants by 7.2 % over non mulched plants.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Buczkowska et al, (1994) revealed that total yield under low tunnel was higher than under open conditions. Sari et al, (1994) reported that increase in yield under low tunnel was due to increase in harvesting span in cucumber. Fruit number per plant was recorded more under protected conditions and it was significantly higher than open field crop.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It influenced the watermelon crop at all growth stages as it reproduced through higher plant biomass and subsequently the fruit yield (Siwek and Capecka, 1999). Sari et al, (1994) reported that increase in yield under low tunnel was POONAM ET AL S93 due to increase in harvesting span in cucumber. The maximum fruit yield in S 1 C 1 over the other treatment combinations of sowing time and covering material non-woven, insect-net and no covering were attributed due to higher fruit weight, number of fruits per plant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%