2009
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2009.5293943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electric pulsed fields are known to induce a wide range of cellular responses, including reversible electroporation (EP, approximately in the range of 0.1–1 kV/cm and 100 µs) [Weaver, ], intracellular manipulation (IEM, approximately 10–1000 kV/cm and duration less than 100 ns) [Hair et al, ], and apoptosis induction with electric pulses (AIEP) or irreversible electrical breakdown (IREB, parameters between EP and IEM) [Al‐Sakere et al, ; Tang et al, ]. The parameters of the electric pulses applied in this work (10 kV/cm, 500 ns) lie in the range of IREB, and the effects of electric pulses on HepG2 cells were more similar to studies using pulses of microseconds and kilovolts per meter [Deng et al, ; Li et al, ], rather than those of nanosecond duration [Stacey et al, ; Donthula et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electric pulsed fields are known to induce a wide range of cellular responses, including reversible electroporation (EP, approximately in the range of 0.1–1 kV/cm and 100 µs) [Weaver, ], intracellular manipulation (IEM, approximately 10–1000 kV/cm and duration less than 100 ns) [Hair et al, ], and apoptosis induction with electric pulses (AIEP) or irreversible electrical breakdown (IREB, parameters between EP and IEM) [Al‐Sakere et al, ; Tang et al, ]. The parameters of the electric pulses applied in this work (10 kV/cm, 500 ns) lie in the range of IREB, and the effects of electric pulses on HepG2 cells were more similar to studies using pulses of microseconds and kilovolts per meter [Deng et al, ; Li et al, ], rather than those of nanosecond duration [Stacey et al, ; Donthula et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrashort electric pulses have been shown to induce different physiological changes in cells including calcium bursts, caspase activation, phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization, growth inhibition in tumor cells, release of calcium from endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, and changes in DNA concentration [Beebe et al, ; Vernier et al, ; Nuccitelli et al, ; Donthula et al, ]. For cells subjected to external electric fields with an electric intensity higher than 10 kV/cm, longer pulses (>300 ns) always result in irreversible electroporation [Chen et al, ; Long et al, ; Ren and Beebe, ] while shorter electric pulses (<60 ns) can affect intracellular structures without disruption of the cell membrane [Schoenbach et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of microsecond electric pulse in IRE for other urological tumors, such as kidney cancer (NCT01967407, NCT02828709, NCT02298608) and urinary bladder neoplasm (NCT02430623), is continually being tested in clinical trials. Further considering urological tumors, nanosecond electric pulses are studied only at the in vitro level [ 16 ].…”
Section: The Theoretical Background Of Epmentioning
confidence: 99%