“…On the positive side, Jermakowicz et al (2007), Bartov et al (2005), Hung and Subramanyam (2007) in Germany and (Pascan, 2014) in Romania found that accounting information is relevant after switching to IFRS, which is consistent with the findings of other researchers from Asia (Benyasrisawat, 2011; Bingbin et al, 2015; Kadri et al, 2011; Kristanto, 2015; Kwon, 2010; Liu & Liu, 2007); from Australia (Chua et al, 2012); from Africa (Adebimpe & Ekwere, 2015; Muhibudeen, 2015; Olugbenga, 2016). On the negative side, Paananen and Lin (2009), Karampinis and Hevas (2011), Kousenidis et al (2010), Bilgic and Ibis (2013), Karğın (2013) in Greece reported the decrease in the quality of accounting information after IFRS adoption, which is consistent with the findings of other researchers from Asia continent (Eccher & Healy, 2000; Haw et al, 1999; Lin & Chen, 2005) who found that Chinese GAAP is more relevant. In Australia, Ahmed and Goodwin (2006) concluded that local AGAAP improved value relevance of accounting information than AIFRS.…”