2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nickel(II) addition on the activity of activated sludge microorganisms and activated sludge process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the treatment performance of SBR system, in terms of SS concentration and TOC removal efficiency, was improved after termination of Ni(II) addition. Further more, the increase of SOUR as shown in Figure 4 (c) indicates the recovery of bioactivity of microbes from the toxic effects of Ni(II) [24].…”
Section: Ni(ii)-containing Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It was observed that the treatment performance of SBR system, in terms of SS concentration and TOC removal efficiency, was improved after termination of Ni(II) addition. Further more, the increase of SOUR as shown in Figure 4 (c) indicates the recovery of bioactivity of microbes from the toxic effects of Ni(II) [24].…”
Section: Ni(ii)-containing Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Studies reported on the same trend as microorganisms are affected with the addition of higher nickel dosage leads to decrease of nickel removal efficiency. However, nickel removal efficiency will start to increase once the microorganisms are adapted with new higher nickel dosage [24][25][26]. Final nickel concentration was below 1.0 mg/L which meets the DOE Standard B discharge limit.…”
Section: Nickel Removalmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many researchers studied the effects of heavy metals on activated sludge system (Ong et al, 2004;Ong et al, 2005b;Santos et al, 2005;Sirianuntapiboon & Ungkaprasatch, 2007;Tsai et al, 2006). However, results from these studies are difficult to be compared due to the various metal bioavailability caused by different operation modes, substrate compositions, seed sludge sources and concentrations.…”
Section: Metal Resistance Of Granular Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results from these studies are difficult to be compared due to the various metal bioavailability caused by different operation modes, substrate compositions, seed sludge sources and concentrations. The total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiency of activated sludge process decreased from 98% to 88% in the presence of Ni (II) while the same Ni (II) loading rate exerted slight influence on aerobic granules system (Ong et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2010). Table 4 gives the metal/VSS ratios causing 50% inhibition of microbial activity of anaerobic granules and flocculent sludge.…”
Section: Metal Resistance Of Granular Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%