2005
DOI: 10.1081/pln-200049149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Nickel on Growth and Composition of Metal Micronutrients in Barley Plants Grown in Nutrient Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
1
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
73
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A decrease in manganese concentration in barley shoots was observed by Rahman et al (2005) in response to nickel application.In tomato plants, manganese was the divalent cation that suffered the most restriction in terms of absorption when nickel was present (PALACIOS et al, 1998).As in the case of manganese, he application of nickel and liming significantly reduced (P <0.01) zinc concentrations in leaves and roots ( Figures 3A and 3C), but not in stems ( Figure 3B). The greatest differences in zinc concentrations in leaves and roots under liming were observed at lower doses, and consequently there was a reduction of this difference as nickel doses increased.…”
Section: Micronutrientsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A decrease in manganese concentration in barley shoots was observed by Rahman et al (2005) in response to nickel application.In tomato plants, manganese was the divalent cation that suffered the most restriction in terms of absorption when nickel was present (PALACIOS et al, 1998).As in the case of manganese, he application of nickel and liming significantly reduced (P <0.01) zinc concentrations in leaves and roots ( Figures 3A and 3C), but not in stems ( Figure 3B). The greatest differences in zinc concentrations in leaves and roots under liming were observed at lower doses, and consequently there was a reduction of this difference as nickel doses increased.…”
Section: Micronutrientsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to metal excluders whose strategy is to control the uptake of metals into the root and prevent metal translocation to aerial organs, hyperaccumulators accumulate metals in the shoot to levels toxic to most other plants (Baker, 1981;Baker and Brooks, 1989;Baker et al, 2000;Pollard et al, 2002;Krämer, 2010;Rascio and Navari-Izzo, 2011). This is remarkable as the photosynthetic apparatus is one of the major targets of metal phytotoxicity, typically resulting in severe symptoms such as chlorosis and necrosis, wilting, abnormal development and reduced growth (Pandey and Sharma, 2002;Rahman et al, 2005;Marschner and Marschner, 2012). These toxic effects are a product of numerous harmful interactions at the cellular level (Haydon and Cobbett, 2007), including nonspecific binding of metals to enzyme functional groups and displacement of other metals from their binding sites, generation of reactive oxygen species by redox-active metals that can lead to disruption of the electrontransport chain (Qadir et al, 2004), lipid peroxidation and subsequent impairment of membrane integrity (Pandolfini et al, 1992;Ros et al, 1992;Gonnelli et al, 2001;Haydon and Cobbett, 2007;Krämer, 2010;Hanikenne and Nouet, 2011).…”
Section: Metal Hyperaccumulation In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low foliar Fe levels are closely associated with high concentrations of Ni in the growing medium. Plants grown in the environment containing Ni are iron deficient due to interaction of Ni-Fe, inhibiting Fe uptake and transportation in plants as well as preventing Fe to perform physiological functions (Rahman et al 2005). Excessive amounts of Ni (10-1,000 mg/kg DW) alters many biochemical and physiological processes including photosynthesis and respiration (Llamas et al 2008;Yusuf et al 2011), mineral nutrition ), membrane functions (Llamas et al 2008) and water uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%