2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-003-0225-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Insect Herbivory: Implications for Community and Ecosystem Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
296
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
4
296
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecologists have long recognized that productivity can impact the strength of top-down control, as the effects of predators depend largely on the abundance of prey species, which are often influenced by nutrient limitation [26,27,38]. Specifically, nutrient subsidies have been suggested to enhance prey quality and abundance, ultimately leading to stronger top-down effects [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologists have long recognized that productivity can impact the strength of top-down control, as the effects of predators depend largely on the abundance of prey species, which are often influenced by nutrient limitation [26,27,38]. Specifically, nutrient subsidies have been suggested to enhance prey quality and abundance, ultimately leading to stronger top-down effects [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilliam (2006) identified general patterns of this response: initial increases in cover, decreases in richness from loss of N-efficient species, decreases in species evenness from increasing dominance of few nitrophilic species, and loss of biodiversity from decreases in richness and evenness. Gilliam (2006) developed a conceptual model to explain this decline: (1) alteration of interspecific competition giving a competitive advantage to nitrophilic species (Price and Morgan 2007), (2) increased herbivory on sensitive species by increasing foliar quality and decreasing secondary defense compounds (Throop and Lerdau 2004), (3) decreased frequency of mycorrhizal infection (decreasing survivorship of mycorrhizae-dependent species; Lilleskov andBruns 2001, Read andPerez-Moreno 2003), (4) increased disease (Mitchell et al 2003), and (5) increased invasive species (Luken 2003, Cassidy et al 2004, Ehrenfeld 2004. A recent hypothesis-the N homogeneity hypothesis (Gilliam 2006)-predicts declines in biodiversity of impacted forests from excess N deposition that decreases naturally high spatial heterogeneity in soil N availability (Hutchings et al 2003, Small andMcCarthy 2003), maintaining high species diversity of the herbaceous layer.…”
Section: Temperate Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Release of N r to the atmosphere has resulted in elevated deposition of N to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, altering the N cycle at regional and global scales (Vitousek et al, 1997;Galloway et al, 2003). Excess N deposition is a potentially serious threat to biodiversity of many groups of organisms, including diversity of plants (Strengbom et al, 2002;Nordin et al, 2006;Clark & Tilman, 2008), microorganisms (Frey et al, 2004;Carfrae et al, 2006) and animals (Throop & Lerdau, 2004;Xu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%