1970
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Nitrogen Nutrition on Leaf Expansion and Photosynthesis of Trifolium subterraneum L. 1. Comparison between Different Levels of Nitrogen Supply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Watson (26,27) concluded that N deficiency limits growth primarily by limiting the rate of leaf area increase, rather than the rate of dry matter accumulation per unit leaf area. This conclusion is supported by numerous studies using both growth analysis and direct measurements of photosynthesis (1,8,9,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Watson (26,27) concluded that N deficiency limits growth primarily by limiting the rate of leaf area increase, rather than the rate of dry matter accumulation per unit leaf area. This conclusion is supported by numerous studies using both growth analysis and direct measurements of photosynthesis (1,8,9,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Watson (26,27) concluded that N deficiency limits growth primarily by limiting the rate of leaf area increase, rather than the rate of dry matter accumulation per unit leaf area. This conclusion is supported by numerous studies using both growth analysis and direct measurements of photosynthesis (1,8,9,19).Much of this effect on leaf area can be ascribed to effects on cell expansion rather than cell division (18, 21), but there are no reports which might suggest an explanation. Cell growth is commonly described by the relationship (11): …”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A, seasonal NAR, and whole plant biomass increased with COj enrichment. Leaf carbohydrate concentration increased at low fertility in both CO2 treatments, indicating a greater negative effect of N availability on leaf growth than on A (Bouma, 1970). This suggests that stimulation of A by elevated CO2 will have few mitigating effects on leaf growth reductions due to low N.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Carbohydrate accumulation in source leaves is typical of plants grown at elevated CO,, (Arp, 1991;WuUschleger, Norby & Hendrix, 1992) as -well as in those grown at low N levels (Bouma, 1970). In either environment, increased TNC results from an increase in source relative to sink strength, and may be a signal through which photosynthetic rate is downregulated in response to this imbalance (Stitt, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is seen as lower C0 2 uptake per unit leaf area (Bouma 1970) and per chlorophyll basis (Bottrill et al 1970). PS II activity increases while PS I activity shows a smaller change as counted on a chlorophyll basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%