2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.094307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of non-Hermiticity on Su-Schrieffer-Heeger defect states

Abstract: We study the emergence and disappearance of defect states in the complex Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (cSSH) model, a non-Hermitian one-dimensional lattice model containing gain and loss on alternating sites. Previous studies of this model have focused on the existence of a non-Hermitian defect state that is localized to the interface between two cSSH domains, and is continuable to the topologically protected defect state of the Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model. For large gain/loss magnitudes, we find that t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biorthogonal [122] and non-Bloch bulk-boundary correspondences [123] are suggested. In contrast, non-Hermiticity does not inevitably destroy the bulk-boundary correspondence [77,78,[93][94][95][96][97], which is verified in a parity-time-symmetric non-Hermitian SSH model with staggered couplings and losses [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92]. Questions arise: Why bulk-boundary correspondence fails in certain non-Hermitian systems?…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Biorthogonal [122] and non-Bloch bulk-boundary correspondences [123] are suggested. In contrast, non-Hermiticity does not inevitably destroy the bulk-boundary correspondence [77,78,[93][94][95][96][97], which is verified in a parity-time-symmetric non-Hermitian SSH model with staggered couplings and losses [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92]. Questions arise: Why bulk-boundary correspondence fails in certain non-Hermitian systems?…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The nontrivial bulk topology in Hermitian systems can * wuyajie@xatu.edu.cn † Junpeng.Hou@utdallas.edu be detected by defects, such as edges, π-flux, dislocations and vortices [48][49][50][51][52][53]. When it comes to non-Hermitian systems, stable edge states could also exist at the interface between topological and trivial phases [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. These topological states, originated from bulk topologies, are immune to local symmetry-preserved perturbations.…”
Section: Non-hermitian Hamiltonian Captures Essentials Of Open Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open systems ubiquitously exist in physics [8][9][10], particularly, the optical and photonic systems; these are mostly non-Hermitian because they interact with the environment [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Currently, topological systems extend into the non-Hermitian region , and the nontrivial topological properties are studied in one-dimensional (1D), twodimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) systems, including the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model [45][46][47][48][49], Aubry-André-Harper (AAH) model [50][51][52][53][54][55], Rice-Mele (RM) model [56,57], Chern insulator [58][59][60][61][62], and Weyl semimetal [63,64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%