2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of non-oral postmenopausal hormone therapy on markers of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(268 reference statements)
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same meta-analysis, the results from nine randomized controlled trials confirmed the increased VTE risk in women treated with oral E (Table 1). Another recent meta-analytic review also found that nonoral routes related to less CVR as it induces less changes in CRP and potential CVR endothelial marker levels (55). The effect of HT on the METS, inflammatory or thrombotic variables in postmenopausal women has also been reported in a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Effects Of Hormone Therapy On Cardiovascular Riskmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the same meta-analysis, the results from nine randomized controlled trials confirmed the increased VTE risk in women treated with oral E (Table 1). Another recent meta-analytic review also found that nonoral routes related to less CVR as it induces less changes in CRP and potential CVR endothelial marker levels (55). The effect of HT on the METS, inflammatory or thrombotic variables in postmenopausal women has also been reported in a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Effects Of Hormone Therapy On Cardiovascular Riskmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…83 Finally, Hemelaar et al underscore the relatively safer profile of oral HRT in relation to atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease. 85 Hemelaar's conclusions are based on a review of studies comparing non-oral with oral postmenopausal HRT.…”
Section: Therapeutic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and apoA-I increase significantly [1][2][3]. In general, these effects of estrogen are considered beneficial from the atherogenic point of view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%