1990
DOI: 10.2514/3.45906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nonplanar outboard wing forms on a wing

Abstract: It is possible for a constant span to obtain better aerodynamic performance from a wing with a nonplanar outboard wing form than from a wing with a planar outboard form, despite the added drag from the increased wetted area. Furthermore, the semispan rolling-moment characteristics indicate the lower wing-root bending moment for some nonplanar configurations. These conclusions are based on an experimental and computational investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of planar and nonplanar outboard wing fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also shown in figure 4e are the C Di values estimated from C Di = C 2 L /(K + 1/πeAR) (denoted by the dashed line). K is the pressure-drag magnification factor and has a typical value of 0.007 (Naik & Ostowari 1990), and e = 0.9 is the Oswald wing-span efficiency factor. The results show that Prandtl's classical lifting-line theory overpredicts the C Di (an order of magnitude larger) for the present near-field low-Reynolds-number experiment with an AR < 4.…”
Section: Variation Of Vortex Flow With X/cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also shown in figure 4e are the C Di values estimated from C Di = C 2 L /(K + 1/πeAR) (denoted by the dashed line). K is the pressure-drag magnification factor and has a typical value of 0.007 (Naik & Ostowari 1990), and e = 0.9 is the Oswald wing-span efficiency factor. The results show that Prandtl's classical lifting-line theory overpredicts the C Di (an order of magnitude larger) for the present near-field low-Reynolds-number experiment with an AR < 4.…”
Section: Variation Of Vortex Flow With X/cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of experiments (for example, Corsiglia et al 1973;Francis and Kennedy 1979;Green and Acosta 1991;McAlister and Takahashi 1991;Shekarriz et al 1993;Chow et al 1997;Ramaprian and Zheng 1997;Birch and Lee 2004;Lee and Pereira 2010) have been conducted to characterize the dynamics of the initial rollup of a tip vortex around the wing tip and its subsequent development in the near field (normally within two or three chord lengths downstream of the wing trailing edge) of a wing. Meanwhile, various passive control devices such as winglets, spoilers, stub/subwing, and porous tips and leading edges (Spillman 1978;Tangler 1978;Muller 1990;Naik and Ostowari 1990;Lee 1994;Liu et al 2001;Lee and Lee 2006) have also been attempted to modify the strength and structure, including the trajectory, of a tip vortex.…”
Section: List Of Symbols Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheared wing tips present a breakdown of the single tip vortex in three vortexes: a small tip vortex, a separation-induced leading-edge vortex and a secondary vortex that sheds from the junction of the main wing and the sheared wing tip. Each of them presents less intensity in comparison with a single vortex presented at basic wing, reducing total wing vortex drag (Vijgen et al , 1989; Van Dam, 1989; Naik and Ostowari, 1990; Spivey and Morehouse, 1970; Siddiqui et al , 2017). Moreover, these wing tips demonstrated negligible wing root bending moment increment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheared wing tips have a simple geometric planform and can be adopted in current airplane design, and therefore can offer a good compromise between performance and cost. Past researches (Van Dam, 1989; Naik and Ostowari, 1990) demonstrated the benefits of the sheared wing tips but very few have been focused on the parametric evaluation of the effects of combination in wing tip leading edge swept angle and the wing tip tapered ratio, keeping the wing aspect ratio (AR) constant and looking for the best compromise between these parameters for a typical low-to-moderate-aspect-ratio wing of a general aviation aircraft. To the authors’ best knowledge, there are no (or very scarce) studies about this main topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%