Effects of Nutrition and Growth-Related Hormones on Pubertal Development

Aubert, Martine; Gruaz, Nadine M.; Pierroz, D. D.; d’Allèves, Violaine; Aebi, Audrey; Chiarello, N.; Sizonenko, Pierre C.

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-78217-6_18

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Growth can occur without differentiation (as in giants: Head & Polly, 2007), and differentiation can occur without growth (as in dwarfs: Needham, 1933;Beamer & Eicher, 1976). Many studies have documented the disengagement of growth from differentiation or sexual maturation as a result of hormonal action (Needham, 1933;Beamer & Eicher, 1976;Shea et al, 1990;Aubert et al, 1993;Fowden, 1995;Gilbert, 2000;Huang & Brown, 2000;Rose, 2005;Nijhout et al, 2006), genetic differences (Needham, 1933;Ishikawa & Namikawa, 1987), artificial selection (Drickamer, 1983), and changes in nutrition (Needham, 1933;Winick, 1961;McCance & Widdowson, 1962;Tanner, 1963;Glass & Swerdloff, 1980), photoperiod (Taranger et al, 2006) and temperature (Pechenik et al, 1990;Jobling, 2002;Forster, Hirst & Woodward, 2011;Forster & Hirst, 2012). Indeed, the well-known 'temperature-size rule' (maturation at smaller sizes at higher temperatures) seen in many ectotherms has been explained as the result of higher temperatures speeding up development (differentiation) more than growth (Atkinson, 1994;van der Have & de Jong, 1996;Forster et al, 2011;Forster & Hirst, 2012;Zuo et al, 2012).…”

Section: Metabolic Theory: Scaling the Fire Of Life (1) The Metamentioning

confidence: 99%

Is metabolic rate a universal ‘pacemaker’ for biological processes?

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A common, long-held belief is that metabolic rate drives the rates of various biological, ecological and evolutionary processes. Although this metabolic pacemaker view (as assumed by the recent, influential 'metabolic theory of ecology') may be true in at least some situations (e.g. those involving moderate temperature effects or physiological processes closely linked to metabolism, such as heartbeat and breathing rate), it suffers from several major limitations, including: (i) it is supported chiefly by indirect, correlational evidence (e.g. similarities between the body-size and temperature scaling of metabolic rate and that of other biological processes, which are not always observed) - direct, mechanistic or experimental support is scarce and much needed; (ii) it is contradicted by abundant evidence showing that various intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g. hormonal action and temperature changes) can dissociate the rates of metabolism, growth, development and other biological processes; (iii) there are many examples where metabolic rate appears to respond to, rather than drive the rates of various other biological processes (e.g. ontogenetic growth, food intake and locomotor activity); (iv) there are additional examples where metabolic rate appears to be unrelated to the rate of a biological process (e.g. ageing, circadian rhythms, and molecular evolution); and (v) the theoretical foundation for the metabolic pacemaker view focuses only on the energetic control of biological processes, while ignoring the importance of informational control, as mediated by various genetic, cellular, and neuroendocrine regulatory systems. I argue that a comprehensive understanding of the pace of life must include how biological activities depend on both energy and information and their environmentally sensitive interaction. This conclusion is supported by extensive evidence showing that hormones and other regulatory factors and signalling systems coordinate the processes of growth, metabolism and food intake in adaptive ways that are responsive to an organism's internal and external conditions. Metabolic rate does not merely dictate growth rate, but is coadjusted with it. Energy and information use are intimately intertwined in living systems: biological signalling pathways both control and respond to the energetic state of an organism. This review also reveals that we have much to learn about the temporal structure of the pace of life. Are its component processes highly integrated and synchronized, or are they loosely connected and often discordant? And what causes the level of coordination that we see? These questions are of great theoretical and practical importance.

show abstract