2020
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ocean acidification on Antarctic marine organisms: A meta‐analysis

Abstract: Southern Ocean waters are among the most vulnerable to ocean acidification. The projected increase in the CO 2 level will cause changes in carbonate chemistry that are likely to be damaging to organisms inhabiting these waters. A meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the vulnerability of Antarctic marine biota occupying waters south of 60°S to ocean acidification. This meta-analysis showed that ocean acidification negatively affects autotrophic organisms, mainly phytoplankton, at CO 2 levels above 1,000 μatm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(231 reference statements)
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors also reinforced the need for more mineralogical studies to characterize a wider range of species. Further, a recent meta-analysis specifically investigated the effect of altered carbonate chemistry on marine organisms south of 60°S from 60 studies (Hancock et al, 2020). Consistent with the previous findings (discussed above), reduced survival and shell calcification rates, and increased dissolution with OA was found in adult calcifying invertebrates, along with a reduction in embryonic or larval development were also shown (Hancock et al, 2020).…”
Section: Strategies To Overcome Ocean Acidificationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors also reinforced the need for more mineralogical studies to characterize a wider range of species. Further, a recent meta-analysis specifically investigated the effect of altered carbonate chemistry on marine organisms south of 60°S from 60 studies (Hancock et al, 2020). Consistent with the previous findings (discussed above), reduced survival and shell calcification rates, and increased dissolution with OA was found in adult calcifying invertebrates, along with a reduction in embryonic or larval development were also shown (Hancock et al, 2020).…”
Section: Strategies To Overcome Ocean Acidificationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…With the aim of performing a meta-analysis, database searches were conducted to compile all peer-reviewed journal articles and literature reviews that investigated the effect of altered seawater carbonate chemistry on SO marine calcifiers using the criteria and methods outlined in Hancock et al (2020) (database searches completed May 2020). Articles were screened to include studies that manipulated the carbonate chemistry to investigate the effects of OA on specifically SO marine calcifiers, and after manual screening, 20 studies remained for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3b conceptually illustrates how temperature dependence in solubility could modulate the p CO 2 dependence and explains why polar species are already negatively impacted by p CO 2 levels that are not detrimental to species thriving in warmer waters. A recent meta‐analysis on the effect of ocean acidification on Southern Ocean phytoplankton indeed shows that p CO 2 levels higher than 1,000 µatm become detrimental for most of the investigated traits (Hancock et al., 2020). Half of the Southern Ocean studies included in our meta‐analysis were conducted at 800 µatm, indicating that growth‐dampening effects can already occur within this century even under CO 2 emission scenario SSP3‐7.0 that is less extreme than the “worst‐case” scenario (SSP5‐8.5; O’Neill et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of multiple drivers on marine phytoplankton have been reviewed in the past (e.g., Deppeler & Davidson, 2017; Edwards et al, 2016; Gao et al., 2012, 2018, 2019; Häder & Gao, 2015). Meta‐analyses, however, deal either with single driver effects (e.g., Dupont et al, 2010; Dutkiewicz et al., 2015; Hancock et al, 2020; Kroeker et al., 2013), only two specific drivers (e.g., Harvey et al, 2013), or only specific phytoplankton groups (e.g., Brandenburg et al, 2019; Crain et al., 2008; Daufresne et al, 2009; Przeslawski et al., 2015). In short, all these investigations reveal substantial nonadditive interactions of multiple drivers on the growth, photosynthesis, and functional traits such as cell size or calcification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%