2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of oil and gas development on vertebrate community composition in the southern San Joaquin Valley, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it could be that gas wells in our study area were not present at a high enough density to have a negative impact on swift fox space use. These findings are consistent with studies on San Joaquin kit foxes that found these animals occupied areas of low to medium oilfield development, but were absent from areas of high-development, potentially due to the abundance of coyotes in high development areas ( Fiehler et al 2017 ). It could be that oil development in our study area had not reached the threshold level where it would begin to have a negative impact on swift foxes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it could be that gas wells in our study area were not present at a high enough density to have a negative impact on swift fox space use. These findings are consistent with studies on San Joaquin kit foxes that found these animals occupied areas of low to medium oilfield development, but were absent from areas of high-development, potentially due to the abundance of coyotes in high development areas ( Fiehler et al 2017 ). It could be that oil development in our study area had not reached the threshold level where it would begin to have a negative impact on swift foxes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Contrary to most studies on the influence of crop fields on swift foxes, research in Kansas that compared swift fox ecology in agricultural versus rangeland-dominated areas, suggested that swift foxes might be tolerant of agricultural fields and use them under certain conditions ( Sovada et al 2003 ). While there are no published studies on the effects of oilfield development on swift foxes, previous research on the effects of oil development on San Joaquin kit foxes found that they use areas with low to medium levels of oil development ( Warrick and Cypher 1998 ; Fiehler et al 2017 ), and that at lower levels of development they do not alter their movements or home range sizes ( Zoellick et al 2002 ). Providing managers with more information on swift fox resource use in the Montana and Canada border region could help to facilitate connectivity among disjunct populations by providing information to help guide habitat conservation and restoration efforts between populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the areas where we established camera stations, these features typically affected < 10% of the habitat and an abundance of intact habitat remained available. In a study of oil field effects on vertebrate communities in the southwestern San Joaquin Valley (Fiehler et al 2017), SJAS continued to be present on plots with about a third of the habitat disturbed by oil field features (e.g., roads, well pads, pipelines, storage tanks, and other facilities).…”
Section: Habitat Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two species may have different habitat preferences with SJAS preferring more arid areas with sparser vegetation and California ground squirrels preferring more mesic areas with denser vegetation (Grinnell and Dixon 1918;Jameson and Peeters 1988). Also, anthropogenic habitat disturbance appears to favor California ground squirrels as evidenced by their abundance in agricultural areas, urban areas, and even highly disturbed oil field areas (Fiehler et al 2017). Such disturbance may allow this species to colonize areas that traditionally were SJAS habitat, as reportedly occurred in the Panoche region (Hawbecker 1975).…”
Section: Habitat Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on life-history attributes, distribution, and habitat relationships have been published by Grinnell and Dixon (1918), Hawbecker (1947Hawbecker ( , 1953Hawbecker ( , 1958Hawbecker ( , 1959, Otten and Cypher (1999), Cypher (2001), Harris (2019), and Germano et al (2021). More germane to the conservation of A. nelsoni, Germano et al (2012) assessed the effects of grazing on population trends of this species while Fiehler et al (2017) assessed the effects of oil field activities. Additional information, particularly on factors affecting population dynamics, however, is necessary for conserving A. nelsoni.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%