2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of operating parameters on fouling mechanism and membrane flux in cross-flow microfiltration of whey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, contrary to these findings, the membrane resistance of the 500 kDa membrane only increased until cycle 1 and reached a constant value of 3.47 Â 10 11 m À1 for successive filtration cycles (n ¼ 2e4). These results are in accordance with previous studies, where an increase in membrane resistance was reported after the first filtration cycle until it reached a stable state after multiple fouling and cleaning cycles (Blanpain-Avet et al, 2004;Mourouzidis-Mourouzis & Karabelas, 2008;Rezaei, Ashtiani, & Fouladitajar, 2011). At the beginning of a series of filtration cycles, an irreversible fouling occurred during filtration, due to deposition of protein particles and aggregates on or within the membrane, which could not be removed during cleaning process and backwashing.…”
Section: Membrane Performance and Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, contrary to these findings, the membrane resistance of the 500 kDa membrane only increased until cycle 1 and reached a constant value of 3.47 Â 10 11 m À1 for successive filtration cycles (n ¼ 2e4). These results are in accordance with previous studies, where an increase in membrane resistance was reported after the first filtration cycle until it reached a stable state after multiple fouling and cleaning cycles (Blanpain-Avet et al, 2004;Mourouzidis-Mourouzis & Karabelas, 2008;Rezaei, Ashtiani, & Fouladitajar, 2011). At the beginning of a series of filtration cycles, an irreversible fouling occurred during filtration, due to deposition of protein particles and aggregates on or within the membrane, which could not be removed during cleaning process and backwashing.…”
Section: Membrane Performance and Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Although a-LA molecules pass the membrane easily, b-LG molecules may possibly interact amongst themselves and form particles as well as a fouling layer on the membrane surface. Such a possible explanation was also suggested by Rezaei et al (2011). Other authors (Alm ecija, Ib añez, Guadix, & Guadix, 2007;Kelly & Zydney, 1997;MourouzidisMourouzis & Karabelas, 2006;Steinhauer, Kulozik, & Gebhardt, 2014) suggest that this differences in transmission is probably due to the different molecular structure of the two whey proteins; b-LG has a free thiol group that leads to a chemical attachment of these proteins to the surface layer via intermolecular disulphide bonds.…”
Section: Effect Of Membrane Pore Size On Phage Retention and Whey Promentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Many researchers have used the adaptation of Hermia's model to evaluate the flux decline in deadend filtration and cross-flow filtration (Bowen et al, 1995;Hwang and Lin, 2002;Herrero et al, 1997;Jacob et al, 1998;Jaffrin et al, 1997;Jonsson et al, 1996;Rezaei et al 2011;Yazdanshenas et al, 2010;Li et al, 2010;Vela et al, 2008, Ye et al, 2005Arnot et al, 2000). However, Field et al (1995) modified Hermia's model (1982) for cross-flow filtration by adding a term that represents convective removal (Equation (6)).…”
Section: Internal Pore Blocking (N = 15)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rezaei et al (2011) employed the combined model developed by Bolton et al (2006a) to analyze the fouling mechanism in crossflow microfiltration of whey. Affandy et al (2013) well described fouling behaviors in sterile microfiltration of large plasmids DNA with the use of the standard-intermediate model.…”
Section: Developments Of Concurrent Combined Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%