2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of oral levamisole as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in health-care workers non-responders to previous vaccinations: A randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were analyzed through a random-effects meta-analysis model using R programming language and Stata (version 11.2).Results: A total of 36 article including 4805 participants were included in this review. The findings revealed that the response rate to HBV vaccination for levamisole in the study group was 46.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]), and that was 43.8% (95% CI [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]) in the control group. These values were also 56.8% (95% CI [53-60]) and 43.3% (95% CI [40-46.7]) for GM-CSF in the study group and the control group, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data were analyzed through a random-effects meta-analysis model using R programming language and Stata (version 11.2).Results: A total of 36 article including 4805 participants were included in this review. The findings revealed that the response rate to HBV vaccination for levamisole in the study group was 46.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]), and that was 43.8% (95% CI [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]) in the control group. These values were also 56.8% (95% CI [53-60]) and 43.3% (95% CI [40-46.7]) for GM-CSF in the study group and the control group, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values were also 56.8% (95% CI [53-60]) and 43.3% (95% CI [40-46.7]) for GM-CSF in the study group and the control group, respectively. Considering AS04, the response rate in the study group was 50.8% (95% CI ), and that was 45.8% (95% CI [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]) in the control group. Moreover, these values were 86.3% (95% CI ) and 47.6% (95% CI ) for AS02B in the study group and the control group, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%