2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of orthognathic surgery on oropharyngeal airway: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
120
0
21

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(137 reference statements)
1
120
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Among its advantages is the evaluation of the regions in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes; the visualization of soft and hard tissues; and the possibility of segmentation for volumetric analysis 8,[11][12][13] . However, image acquisition in both methods may be impaired due to the position of the head and tongue, breathing, and time necessary for the scanning procedure 8,18,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among its advantages is the evaluation of the regions in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes; the visualization of soft and hard tissues; and the possibility of segmentation for volumetric analysis 8,[11][12][13] . However, image acquisition in both methods may be impaired due to the position of the head and tongue, breathing, and time necessary for the scanning procedure 8,18,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mattos et al [16] stated that there is a significant decrease in retropalatal dimension (mean 0.91 mm) and a highly significant decrease in retrolingual dimension (mean 2.83 mm) but no significant change in the minimal PAS. In contrast, our study found no significant changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [14] found that after mandibular setback surgery the PAS was narrowed at the levels of the oropharynx and hypopharynx by about 2.85 and 3.62 mm, respectively. Mattos et al [16] did a systemic review with meta-analysis and showed a significant decrease in oropharyngeal airway in retropalatal (mean 2.57 mm) and in retrolingual (mean 2.99 mm) dimension. Our findings agreed with these studies.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies with two dimensional analysis conducted on CT, anteroposterior distance and width of airway space at the level of tongue base was shown to decrease postoperatively 12,13 . Mattos et al 5 con ducted a meta analysis and reported that in mandibular laryngopharyngeal space. The oropharyngeal space showed significant decrease, whereas the laryngopharyngeal space did not.…”
Section: Young-wook Kwon Et Al: Three-dimensional Analysis Of Pharyngmentioning
confidence: 99%