2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00338-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of oscillation amplitude on aerodynamic derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the representation given in Eq. (1) [18]. In addition to the above-presented convention for flutter derivatives, some other conventions are also used, as shown in [19,20].…”
Section: Bridge Flutter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the representation given in Eq. (1) [18]. In addition to the above-presented convention for flutter derivatives, some other conventions are also used, as shown in [19,20].…”
Section: Bridge Flutter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the selected cases, Case 1 is associated with a rectangular deck shape (Noda et al, 2003); Cases 2 (Gu et al, 2000) and 3 (Iwamoto and Fujino, 1995) are hexagonal cross-sections (see Table 2 …”
Section: Verification Of the Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the initial vertical and torsional amplitudes of the bridge deck are selected respectively as 0.25D and 1.3°, which are considered reasonably small to avoid the amplitude effects (Noda et al, 2003).…”
Section: Flutter Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations