2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17385-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Parasitic Crustacea on Hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for this size cutoff is that the parasite's presence may reduce the fitness of these alternate hosts, making them more susceptible to other pathogens or predation (Binning et al., 2014; Binning et al., 2013). Hosts suffer hemorrhaging and physical damage to tissues (Huizinga, 1972) and an energy deficit due to the resources the parasite is taking from it (Johnson et al., 2019). Hosts may also suffer from specific limitations on oxygen demand from gill damage (Rameshkumar & Ravichandran, 2013), limits to food ingestion when the tongue is parasitized (Chávez López et al., 2005) or limits to locomotive ability when body cavity parasites impact muscular movement or external parasites increase drag (De Lima et al., 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this size cutoff is that the parasite's presence may reduce the fitness of these alternate hosts, making them more susceptible to other pathogens or predation (Binning et al., 2014; Binning et al., 2013). Hosts suffer hemorrhaging and physical damage to tissues (Huizinga, 1972) and an energy deficit due to the resources the parasite is taking from it (Johnson et al., 2019). Hosts may also suffer from specific limitations on oxygen demand from gill damage (Rameshkumar & Ravichandran, 2013), limits to food ingestion when the tongue is parasitized (Chávez López et al., 2005) or limits to locomotive ability when body cavity parasites impact muscular movement or external parasites increase drag (De Lima et al., 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is yet limited information on the effects that parasitic crustaceans have on their hosts at a population level, as well as on the indirect effects that they may have on species that interact with their hosts, i.e. community level effects (Johnson et al, 2019). This is true particularly for A. chicomendesi, E. turucuyus and E. berbicensis, which infests Amazonian fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shellfish and marine crustaceans such as the noble crayfish ( Astacus astacus ) (Halder and Ahne, 1988), the green shore crab ( Carcinus maenas) , the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna and the shrimp Penaeus japonicus (Mortensen et al., 1993) have been reported to be potential vectors for IPNV. Also, IPNV has been detected in the copepod sea louse ( Lepeophtheirus salmonis ) although there is no evidence that copepods can serve as vectors of any virus in field studies (Johnson et al., 2004) promoted copepod control (Overstreet et al., 2009). In addition, piscivorous bird species, which prey upon IPNV‐infected rainbow trout, were shown to excrete the virus (McAllister and Owens, 1992).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%