“…A more general model allowing, for example, thermodynamic disequilibrium would require parameterization of all small‐scale effects, which are still poorly understood (Loper, 1992). In addition, the interaction between reactive particles (Huguet et al., 2020) and a stratified layer, as well as the collective behavior of iron crystals (Kriaa et al., 2022) and their effects on large‐scale flow, can alter the picture of steady iron snow. While the heterogeneity of the flux at the core upper boundary (Amit et al., 2015) or the radial distribution of the buoyancy flux (Cao et al., 2014) modify the resulting magnetic field, dynamo simulations driven by iron snow have so far assumed a uniform and stationary buoyancy flux below the snow layer (Christensen, 2015; Vilim et al., 2010).…”