2015
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of partly replacing dietary starch with fiber and fat on milk production and energy partitioning

Abstract: The effects of partly replacing dietary starch with fiber and fat to provide a diet with similar net energy for lactation (NEL) density on yields of milk and milk components and on energy partitioning were evaluated in a crossover design experiment. Holstein cows (n = 32; 109 ± 22 d in milk, mean ± standard deviation) were randomly assigned to treatment sequence. Treatments were a high-starch diet containing 33% corn grain (mixture of dry ground and high-moisture corn; HS) or a high-fiber, high-fat diet contai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
86
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction of diet and experiment was also significant for ΔBCS and ΔBodyE, with cows in all experiments having greater ΔBCS and ΔBodyE when fed HI diets, but differences between diets were only significant for experiment 3 (Boerman et al, 2015a). One reason that differences were significant for experiment 3 and not experiments 1, 2, and 4 could be that the LO diet for experiment 3 was formulated by replacing starch with forage, nonforage fiber, and supplemental fat (Boerman et al, 2015a); in experiments 1 (Boerman et al, 2015b), 2, and 4, nonforage fiber replaced starch to formulate LO diets. Gross feed efficiency was greater when cows were fed HI diets, which could have been due to the greater energy content of HI diets or to increased lipogenesis that was observed for HI diets (as indicated by increased ΔBodyE and ΔBW), but similar MilkE for both diets.…”
Section: Production Responses To High and Low Starch Dietsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The interaction of diet and experiment was also significant for ΔBCS and ΔBodyE, with cows in all experiments having greater ΔBCS and ΔBodyE when fed HI diets, but differences between diets were only significant for experiment 3 (Boerman et al, 2015a). One reason that differences were significant for experiment 3 and not experiments 1, 2, and 4 could be that the LO diet for experiment 3 was formulated by replacing starch with forage, nonforage fiber, and supplemental fat (Boerman et al, 2015a); in experiments 1 (Boerman et al, 2015b), 2, and 4, nonforage fiber replaced starch to formulate LO diets. Gross feed efficiency was greater when cows were fed HI diets, which could have been due to the greater energy content of HI diets or to increased lipogenesis that was observed for HI diets (as indicated by increased ΔBodyE and ΔBW), but similar MilkE for both diets.…”
Section: Production Responses To High and Low Starch Dietsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…An additional milk sample was collected at each milking on d 21, 42, and 63 of the study and stored without preservative at −20°C for determination of FA profile. Body weight measurements were taken 3 times per week following the afternoon milking, and BW change was calculated according to Boerman et al (2015b). Body condition was scored weekly by 3 trained investigators on a 5-point scale, in 0.25-unit increments, where 1 = thin and 5 = fat, as described by Wildman et al (1982).…”
Section: Data and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dried samples were ground with a Wiley mill (1-mm screen; Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA). Feed ingredients, orts, and feces were analyzed for NDF, CP, and starch concentration as described by Boerman et al (2015b). Fatty acid concentrations in feed ingredients, orts, and feces were determined as described by Lock et al (2013).…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glucogenic nutrients are highly important to intermediary metabolism during ruminant lactation because mammary glucose use is high, but direct glucose absorption from the diet is low. Glucogenic diets fed to cows in early and mid-lactation promote energy storage in the body and decrease milk energy content (van Knegsel et al, 2007a,b;Boerman et al, 2015). These shifts in energy partitioning are also observed when glucose or glucogenic precursors are infused along the digestive tract Rigout et al, 2002a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%