2015
DOI: 10.1097/jcn.0000000000000127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Partners Together in Health Intervention on Physical Activity and Healthy Eating Behaviors

Abstract: Background Despite proven efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in helping patients initiate physical activity and healthy eating changes, less than 50% of CR participants maintain changes 6 months later. Objective The objective of this feasibility study was to test the Partners Together in Health (PaTH) Intervention versus usual care (UC) in improving physical activity and healthy eating behaviors in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients and spouses. Methods An experimental, two-group (n … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This dovetails with previous research indicating that persons were more likely to increase their PA if their partner had done so [6,18]. Such findings support recent innovations in PA interventions that recognize the importance of the partnership for PA [50,51]. Indeed, interventions that include the partner may be more effective in enhancing PA than individualbased interventions-even if PA change is quantified on the individual level [52].…”
Section: Links Of Mvpa and Sedentary Synchrony With Individual Weeklysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This dovetails with previous research indicating that persons were more likely to increase their PA if their partner had done so [6,18]. Such findings support recent innovations in PA interventions that recognize the importance of the partnership for PA [50,51]. Indeed, interventions that include the partner may be more effective in enhancing PA than individualbased interventions-even if PA change is quantified on the individual level [52].…”
Section: Links Of Mvpa and Sedentary Synchrony With Individual Weeklysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A purposive subsample of 11 couples (patient and spouse) was obtained from the sample of couples (n = 34) that participated in a larger clinical trial. 13 A maximal variation strategy 16 was used to recruit subsample participants to achieve variation in gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in relation to role (patient-husband, partner-wife versus patient-wife, partner-husband; Hispanic patient and spouse). All patients had undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery at either an academic medical center or community hospital located in the Midwestern United States.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing couple-oriented interventions involve the spouse as a way to be a benefit to the cardiac patient 9 , despite evidence that the spouse would also benefit from making and maintaining diet and PA behavior changes. 10–12 In a recent couple-focused intervention where patients and spouses in the experimental group participated in CR together and spouses were asked to make the same healthy eating and PA changes as patients, Yates et al 13 found promising preliminary effects of the intervention for improving adherence to healthy eating and PA beyond CR. Embedded within this clinical trial, a qualitative study was conducted to describe the couple-focused facilitators and barriers to healthy eating and PA behaviors in patients and spouses after CR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This descriptive repeated-measures study was a secondary analysis of existing data collected as part of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In the parent RCT, patients and spouses in the experimental group participated in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) together and spouses were asked to make the same healthy eating and physical activity changes as patients (Yates et al, 2015). Data were collected at three time points: pre-CR (baseline, early hospital discharge) and post-CR (3 month), and three months later (6 month time point).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%