1990
DOI: 10.2307/2112838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Peer, Faculty, and Parental Influences on Students' Persistence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
64
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have found that faculty norms and self-reported faculty interactions with students influence student behavior above individual, student characteristics (Comeaux 2005a, b). In a single institution study of undergraduates at a large Midwestern university, Bank et al (1990) found that faculty norms significantly affected students' positive university intentions which then affected the student's decision to either remain enrolled or drop out of college. One limitation of this study is that the faculty norms were created by asking students to attribute particular norms to the faculty at their institution, not by asking the faculty themselves.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers have found that faculty norms and self-reported faculty interactions with students influence student behavior above individual, student characteristics (Comeaux 2005a, b). In a single institution study of undergraduates at a large Midwestern university, Bank et al (1990) found that faculty norms significantly affected students' positive university intentions which then affected the student's decision to either remain enrolled or drop out of college. One limitation of this study is that the faculty norms were created by asking students to attribute particular norms to the faculty at their institution, not by asking the faculty themselves.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bank et al (1990) and Steele (1997) show that the contextual effects of peers i.e. expectations and standards, are even stronger influences on student behavior 1 The term ''norm'' has been utilized in the literature to describe a variety of contexts and often times does not adhere to the Bank et al (1990) definition we employ in this manuscript. In some of the studies reviewed in this section (e.g., Astin 1993;Milem 1998), faculty ''norms'' could more aptly be termed faculty perceptions or faculty attitudes.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Astin (1993) went so far as to describe a student's peer group as the most influential factor affecting a student's growth while in college. Other studies during the 1990s pointed to peer-to-peer interaction and support as positively impacting students' intent to persist (Eimers & Pike, 1997) as well as actual persistence into the second year (Bank, Slavings, Biddle, 1990).…”
Section: The 1990smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively recent overview of contagion-like influence is given in 35 . Bank 36 identified different types of influence on students' persistence such as peer, faculty, and parental influences. Parents and peers were found to have stronger influences than were the faculty on the persistence of students.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%