1983
DOI: 10.2527/jas1983.574922x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Pelleting Conditions on Performance of Pigs Fed a Corn-Soybean Meal Diet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hens fed the sand diet adjusted feed intake so that caloric intake and rate of egg production were higher than for those fed the wood fiber diet. Bulk density results from the present experiment are different from previous research (Skoch et al, 1983). In that research, bulk density was 0.50 for the corn-soy diet in mash form and 0.68 when pellets were formed using steam.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Hens fed the sand diet adjusted feed intake so that caloric intake and rate of egg production were higher than for those fed the wood fiber diet. Bulk density results from the present experiment are different from previous research (Skoch et al, 1983). In that research, bulk density was 0.50 for the corn-soy diet in mash form and 0.68 when pellets were formed using steam.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Hardness and water stability are important factors which determine nutrient retention capacity as well as the sinking velocity of pellets (Baeverfjord et al, 2006;Chevanan et al, 2009;. The hardness of pellets generally affects their preference and acceptability by fish, where softer pellets are usually preferred to harder pellets (Aas et al, 2011;Skoch et al, 1983). High water-stable diets are known to prolong digestion and intestinal absorption of nutrients in fish (Pillay and Kutty, 2005;Venou et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the vast majority of research comparing meal and pelleted diets in finishing pigs has shown significant or numerical improvements in ADG when pigs are fed pelleted diets (Skoch et al, 1983;Wondra et al, 1995a,b;Potter et al, 2010). The lack of an improvement in ADG in pigs fed pelleted diets may be a result of worsened stomach morphology as indicated by the ulcer index scores.…”
Section: Growth and Carcassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wondra et al (1995b) observed that pigs fed a pelleted diet had reduced intake when compared with pigs fed a meal diet. The decrease in feed intake from feeding a pelleted diet may be a result of feed wastage being limited, as noted by Hanrahan (1984), or as a result of the improved digestibility of a pelleted diet (Skoch et al, 1983). Improvements in digestibility or less feed wastage would also explain why pigs fed pelleted diets throughout had the most improved (P < 0.05) G:F whereas pigs fed meal throughout had the worst G:F (P < 0.05) and all other treatments were intermediate (P < 0.05).…”
Section: Growth and Carcassmentioning
confidence: 99%