2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of perceptual and working memory load on brain responses to task-irrelevant stimuli: Review and implications for future research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this finding suggests that the impact of destabilizing OF perturbations is modulated when attention is diverted toward auditory cues to process a secondary task. One explanation may rely on the sensory modality of the cognitive task: a visual task would have increased engagement in the visual field, whereas an auditory task prompted participants to redirect their attention elsewhere, which has resulted in a reduction of the impact of OF perturbations on gait control (Wickens, 2002;Lavie et al, 2004;Redfern et al, 2017;Pechtl et al, 2020;Brockhoff et al, 2022). Also, it is consistent with the idea that resolving sensory conflict requires executive control of attention (Yogev-Seligmann et al, 2008;Redfern et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, this finding suggests that the impact of destabilizing OF perturbations is modulated when attention is diverted toward auditory cues to process a secondary task. One explanation may rely on the sensory modality of the cognitive task: a visual task would have increased engagement in the visual field, whereas an auditory task prompted participants to redirect their attention elsewhere, which has resulted in a reduction of the impact of OF perturbations on gait control (Wickens, 2002;Lavie et al, 2004;Redfern et al, 2017;Pechtl et al, 2020;Brockhoff et al, 2022). Also, it is consistent with the idea that resolving sensory conflict requires executive control of attention (Yogev-Seligmann et al, 2008;Redfern et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This allowed to confirm that the sensory modality of the concurrent task matters. Indeed, a cognitive task presented in the auditory modality may reduce the ability to process visual information (Wickens, 2002;Redfern et al, 2017, Brockhoff et al, 2022, due to the allocation of attentional resources towards another sensory (auditory) modality. In turn, this phenomenon could decrease the influence of ML optic flow perturbations on gait stability (e.g., standard deviation of the head position, Malcolm et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…van Harten et al (2021) observed that surgery staff with high workload is more likely distracted by irrelevant sounds than surgery staff with low workload. However, this relationship is simplified as high load can also reduce the pro-cessing of irrelevant sounds (Brockhoff, Schindler, Bruchmann, & Straube, 2022). Studying the relationship between load and auditory processing in the operating room is therefore necessary to understand the effect that sounds have on the surgery staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electroencephalography (EEG) results showed that early event‐related potential (ERP) components could reflect selective attentional responses involving a perceptual load, suggesting that the perceptual load had already influenced information flow during the initial stages of visual cortical processing (Fu et al., 2010; Handy & Mangun, 2000; Handy et al., 2001). However, a recent systematic evaluation suggested that ERP effects of load‐attenuating distractor processing were more reliable at a slightly later stage than the mixed results in the early attention selection process (Brockhoff et al., 2022). For example, deeper features increased the anterior P2 amplitudes, which might reflect the process of visual feature detection and attentional selection (Cao et al., 2020; Correll et al., 2006; Nikolaev et al., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent systematic evaluation suggested that ERP effects of load-attenuating distractor processing were more reliable at a slightly later stage than the mixed results in the early attention selection process (Brockhoff et al, 2022). For example, deeper features increased the anterior P2 amplitudes, which might reflect the process of visual feature detection and attentional selection (Cao et al, 2020;Correll et al, 2006;Nikolaev et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%