Abstract. Endocrine disruptors (EDs) with androgenic and anti-androgenic effects may alter reproductive function by binding to androgenic receptors (AR) and inducing or modulating AR-dependent responses in the male reproductive system. However, the molecular mechanism(s) underlying these events remains unclear. In the present study, pregnant Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were treated with testosterone propionate (TP), flutamide (Flu) and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) from gestation days (GD) 11 to 21. Interestingly, maternal exposure to Flu or DEHP caused fluctuations in the neonatal levels of serum testosterone (T) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Serum testosterone and LH were upregulated by Flu, but these hormones were down-regulated by DEHP. The anogenital distances (AGD) of male newborns were determined at post-neonatal days (PND) 1, 21 and 63. Male rats treated prenatally with DEHP (100 mg/kg mother's body weight) or Flu showed an AGD shorter than that of control rats. At PND 63, sperm concentration, viability and motility were reduced in the maternal DEHP and Flu-treated groups. The numbers of seminiferous tubules were reduced in the Flu and DEHP-treated offspring when compared with the vehicle-and TPtreated groups, and the tubules of the testes at PND 63 were disrupted by a high dose of Flu. In addition, we found differential gene expression patterns by microarray analysis following ED exposure, particularly in sex determinationrelated genes. Although Flu and DEHP are considered to be identical with regard to their anti-androgenic effects, their effects on developing male reproductive organs were distinct, suggesting that Flu competes with endogenous T, while DEHP influences a different step in androgenesis. Key words: Flutamide, Male reproduction, Phthalate (J. Reprod. Dev. 55: [400][401][402][403][404][405][406][407][408][409][410][411] 2009) ecently, environmental, anti-androgenic compounds have been recognized as endocrine disruptors (EDs) because of their hormone-like activities. Anti-androgenic chemicals have the potential to interfere with male reproductive development and function in humans and animals. The EDs are thought to act via many mechanisms, such as by decreasing androgen synthesis, exerting effects on the pituitary-gonadal axis and/or blocking the androgen receptor (AR) [1,2]. The consequences of these actions may cause abnormal hormonal regulation and gene expression.It has been demonstrated that the AR plays a critical role in control of male sexual differentiation. During mammalian sex differentiation, the androgens, testosterone (T) and its metabolite dihydrotestosterone (DHT), produced by the fetal/neonatal male during sexual differentiation are critical factors in the male phenotype [3]. Sex development continues postnatally with the onset of secondary sexual characteristics at puberty and the acquisition of reproductive capacity. In addition, the differentiation of the Wolffian structures (e.g., the epididymis, vas deferens and seminal vesicles) appears to be T-mediated, while ma...