2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of perturbation magnitude on dynamic stability when walking in destabilizing environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(68 reference statements)
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3B, Table 3) dynamic instability of the ML COM movements of all body segments. This indicates that visual and walking surface perturbations significantly affect whole body stability, as previously shown (McAndrew et al, 2011; Sinitski et al, 2012; Terry et al, 2012). Importantly, the present findings extend these prior results to other body segments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3B, Table 3) dynamic instability of the ML COM movements of all body segments. This indicates that visual and walking surface perturbations significantly affect whole body stability, as previously shown (McAndrew et al, 2011; Sinitski et al, 2012; Terry et al, 2012). Importantly, the present findings extend these prior results to other body segments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Hip and knee flexion increases to lower center of mass, and ankle dorsi flexion and hip and knee flexion increase during swing phase to increase toe clearance (Gates et al, 2012). When exposed to side to side perturbations of the visual field or walking surface, healthy young adults exhibited greater dynamic instability (McAndrew et al, 2011; Sinitski et al, 2012) and increased stepping and trunk movement variability (McAndrew et al, 2010). These became more pronounced with larger perturbation amplitudes (Sinitksi et al, 2012; Terry et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short-term LDE of trunk motion and the variability of MOS and step measures detect the effects of stroke on walking stability. Although these stability measures can directly reflect the increased instability resulting from experimentally induced perturbations [13,15,16], it is unclear to what extent these measures are related to actual falls. Thus, it is necessary to validate these stability measures [14] before applying them to detect potential fallers clinically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unknown if the sensitivity of locomotor system to small perturbations will predict its capacity to resist all perturbations without falling [14]. However, these measures that quantify responses to small perturbations can directly reflect the increased instability of human walking resulting from larger perturbations [13,15,16]. The amplitude of short-term LDE and maxFM increased substantially and responded specifically to different types of external perturbations [13,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation