2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of phencyclidines on signal transfer from the entorhinal cortex to the hippocampus in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies, it had been shown that high‐frequency stimulation (HFS) of the dCI could interfere with plasticity in area CA1. However, under physiological conditions high‐frequency activation is an unlikely event in this pathway as the cells of origin for this pathway, EC layer III pyramidal cells, display strong frequency adaptation due to intrinsic properties (Erchova et al ., 2004) and due to synaptic interactions (Gloveli et al ., 1997a), which is only overcome under pathological conditions (Gloveli et al ., 2003; Dugladze et al ., 2004). In this study we therefore investigated the effects of low‐frequency stimulation (LFS) usually employed for induction of long‐term depression (LTD) applied to the dCI.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In these studies, it had been shown that high‐frequency stimulation (HFS) of the dCI could interfere with plasticity in area CA1. However, under physiological conditions high‐frequency activation is an unlikely event in this pathway as the cells of origin for this pathway, EC layer III pyramidal cells, display strong frequency adaptation due to intrinsic properties (Erchova et al ., 2004) and due to synaptic interactions (Gloveli et al ., 1997a), which is only overcome under pathological conditions (Gloveli et al ., 2003; Dugladze et al ., 2004). In this study we therefore investigated the effects of low‐frequency stimulation (LFS) usually employed for induction of long‐term depression (LTD) applied to the dCI.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Blockade of NMDA receptors with ketamine reduces the output from superficial basket cells concurrently with a selective drop in gamma power in superficial layers. Disinhibition of the entorhinal cortex also has been reported in slices from rats pretreated with NMDA receptor antagonists (Dugladze et al, 2004). It is not clear why ketamine produces a similar pattern of selective reduction of gamma power in superficial layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We addressed alterations in the dCI‐induced synaptic plasticity in MK‐801‐treated animals, as previous studies in the same model had shown that stimulus‐evoked field potentials in layer III of the EC, which directly projects to CA1, were altered, whereas those in other layers were unaffected, suggesting an alteration in synaptic transmission in this pathway. High‐frequency input to layer III cells in MK‐801‐treated rats led to reduced frequency habituation as compared to control animals (Dugladze et al ., 2004), suggesting that high‐frequency activation of this pathway may occur in MK‐801‐treated rats and that high‐frequency synaptic input can reach the hippocampus, where, in normal animals, it would induce LTP (Wohrl et al ., 2007). Furthermore, MK‐801‐treated rats show alterations of synaptic plasticity in the subiculum that, like the CA1, receives an important input via dCI (Buck et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, MK‐801 interferes with frequency adaptation in EC layer III pyramidal cells, which form the dCI to CA1 (Gloveli et al ., 1997; Erchova et al ., 2004). Thus, high‐frequency activation of the dCI is likely in the presence of MK‐801 that, under physiological conditions, would be blocked during high‐frequency stimulation (HFS) (Gloveli et al ., 2003; Dugladze et al ., 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%