“…Numerous studies have explored the environmental controls of sap flux and found the main controlling factors include meteorological variables (e.g., incoming short-wave radiation, Rsi, vapour pressure deficit, VPD, air temperature, Ta, among others) (Chen et al, 2011;Chu et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2011), soil water conditions (soil water content and potential) (Ewers et al, 2008;Horna et al, 2011;Zeppel et al, 2008), and tree phenological development (e.g., leaf area index) (Liu et al, 2012;Tie et al, 2017;Xu et al, 2011), but the responses of sap flux to these factors also vary with species (Small & McConnell, 2008), climatic conditions (Chen et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2012), and geographic locations (Du et al, 2011;Poyatos et al, 2021). The variation of sap flux on diurnal timescale is generally a unimodal curve following incoming short-wave radiation (Fiora & Cescatti, 2006;Liu et al, 2017). More generally, such pattern is usually found among anisohydric species which is suggested to have a risky water use strategy by keeping stomata open even under severe water stress (Burkhardt & Pariyar, 2016;Kannenberg et al, 2022;Ulrich & Grossiord, 2023;Yi et al, 2017); but for the isohydric species, water stress usually induces stomatal closure, and a decline in sap flux often emerges around the noontime because of the leaf water stress (Attia et al, 2015;Nathália da Silva et al, 2016;Nolan et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2021).…”