Effects of physical driving experience on body movement and motion sickness among passengers in a virtual vehicle

Chang, Chih Hui; Stoffregen, Thomas A.; Cheng, Kuo‐Sheng; Lei, Man Kit; Li, Chung Chieh

doi:10.1007/s00221-020-05940-6

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the age range was wide, the participants were all adults and less is known about the development of VIMS susceptibility in younger people. VIMS susceptibility in children may show stronger age relationships, for instance, a steep rise in susceptibility from very early ages with a possible peak around 8 to 9 years is possible (but see Chang et al 2021 ). By analogy, Henriques et al ( 2014 ) investigated motion susceptibility in children using an adapted version of the MSSQ: following this logic, an adapted version of the VIMSSQ could be employed as well.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The situation may be complicated since it has been suggested that sex differences in susceptibility to VIMS may be stimulus specific, for example, VIMS might be less strong for rotary motion stimuli, but stronger for linear motion stimuli, but this remains unproven (Koslucher et al 2015 ). In contrast to classic motion sickness, children aged 4–10 seem less prone to VIMS (Chang et al 2021 ), but an increase in susceptibility has been reported later in life with older adults (Keshavarz et al 2018 ; Brooks et al 2010 ), although this remains to be definitely proven. However, outside of biological sex and age, only little is known about the relationship between other trait characteristics and VIMS.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measuring the susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness and its relationship with vertigo, dizziness, migraine, syncope and personality traits

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The widespread use of visual technologies such as Virtual Reality increases the risk of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS). Previously, the 6-item short version of the Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (VIMSSQ short form) has been validated for predicting individual variation in VIMS. The aim of the current study was to investigate how the susceptibility to VIMS is correlated with other relevant factors in the general population. A total of 440 participants (201 M, 239F), mean age 33.6 (SD 14.8) years, completed an anonymous online survey of various questionnaires including the VIMSSQ, Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (MSSQ), Vertigo in City questionnaire (VIC), Migraine (scale), Social & Work Impact of Dizziness (SWID), Syncope (faintness), and Personality (‘Big Five’ TIPI). The VIMSSQ correlated positively with the MSSQ (r = 0.50), VIC (r = 0.45), Migraine (r = 0.44), SWID (r = 0.28), and Syncope (r = 0.15). The most efficient Multiple Linear Regression model for the VIMSSQ included the predictors MSSQ, Migraine, VIC, and Age and explained 40% of the variance. Factor analysis of strongest correlates with VIMSSQ revealed a single factor loading with VIMSSQ, MSSQ, VIC, Migraine, SWID, and Syncope, suggesting a common latent variable of sensitivity. The set of predictors for the VIMSSQ in the general population has similarity with those often observed in patients with vestibular disorders. Based on these correlational results, we suggest the existence of continuum of underlying risk factors for sensitivity, from healthy population to patients with extreme visual vertigo and perhaps Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness and its relationship with vertigo, dizziness, migraine, syncope and personality traits

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some experimental studies have applied the Postural Instability Theory; the one proposed by Stoffregen ( 64 ), measured through the SSQ, found that postural instability preceded the subjective symptoms of motion sickness in a fixed-base flight simulator with a 150 ° (H) × 70 ° (V) FOV, in a sample size of 14 participants. Based on the same theory and test, Chang et al ( 65 ) analyzed the effects of motion sickness in 40 participants (young adults, with a mean age of 24), who did or did not have previous driving experience, in a fixed-base simulator, concluding that motion sickness is related to experienced patterns (in real driving) of postural control. Furthermore, Li et al ( 66 ) applied both MSSQ and SSQ to 26 female participants with a one degree of freedom simulator, finding that virtual time-to-contact (or time before contact with postural stability boundary) differed between participants who experienced motion sickness and those who did not.…”

Section: Simulator Sicknessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driving and Flying Simulators: A Review on Relevant Considerations and Trends

Serje

Acuña

2021

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation R

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Flying and driving simulation has encouraged an enormous and growing community in a wide variety of areas such as research centers, driver or pilot training academies, vehicle-testing facilities, amusement parks, and even at home by household enthusiasts, providing carefully integrated visual and perceptual illusions of driving or flying real vehicles. The global research on this subject is explored during the period 2000 to 2019 from an interdisciplinary perspective based on a systematic methodology, providing both new and experienced researchers with broad guidance toward key aspects for further investigations and developments. Emphasis is given to the analysis of the findings and in particular to their applicability, to an extent not attempted earlier, by considering both human and machine aspects.

show abstract

“…These surrogates can be limited by technical and physical factors such as latency, graphical fidelity, and motion scaling factors [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Several studies have measured postural sway at the trunk or head during a simulated (driving, flight), physical driving, or gaming exposures, and some of these studies have reported significant differences relative to pre-exposure postural sway [ 7 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Among the existing studies that have quantified post-drive standing balance performance, only simulated driving routes have been used with participants as the drivers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Drive Standing Balance of Vehicle Passengers Using Wearable Sensors: The Effect of On-Road Driving and Task Performance

Jones

Sienko

2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Postural sway has been demonstrated to increase following exposure to different types of motion. However, limited prior studies have investigated the relationship between exposure to normative on-road driving conditions and standing balance following the exposure. The purpose of this on-road study was to quantify the effect of vehicle motion and task performance on passengers’ post-drive standing balance performance. In this study, trunk-based kinematic data were captured while participants performed a series of balance exercises before and after an on-road driving session in real-time traffic. Postural sway for all balance exercises increased following the driving session. Performing a series of ecologically relevant visual-based tasks led to increases in most post-drive balance metrics such as sway position and velocity. However, the post-drive changes following the driving session with a task were not significantly different compared to changes observed following the driving session without a task. The post-drive standing balance performance changes observed in this study may increase vulnerable users’ risk of falling. Wearable sensors offer an opportunity to monitor postural sway following in-vehicle exposures.

show abstract

Effects of physical driving experience on body movement and motion sickness among passengers in a virtual vehicle

Cited by 8 publications

References 15 publications

Measuring the susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness and its relationship with vertigo, dizziness, migraine, syncope and personality traits

Measuring the susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness and its relationship with vertigo, dizziness, migraine, syncope and personality traits

Driving and Flying Simulators: A Review on Relevant Considerations and Trends

Post-Drive Standing Balance of Vehicle Passengers Using Wearable Sensors: The Effect of On-Road Driving and Task Performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About