2022
DOI: 10.3390/plants11202732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Cyanobacteria on Botanical Characteristics of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) Plants

Abstract: Tomatoes are an important agricultural product because they contain high concentrations of bioactive substances, such as folate, ascorbate, polyphenols, and carotenoids, as well as many other essential elements. As a result, tomatoes are thought to be extremely beneficial to human health. Chemical fertilizers and insecticides are routinely utilized to maximize tomato production. In this context, microbial inoculations, particularly those containing PGPR, may be utilized in place of chemical fertilizers and pes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a tomato biofertilization study, Yagmur and Gunes [ 15 ] reported that the single use of the strains B. megaterium , Paenibacillus polymxa , Burkholderia cepacia, and Azospirillum sp., increased the TSS, the electric conductivity, and the pH of tomato fruits. In a similar work, Gashash et al [ 37 ] reported that the co-inoculation of the strains B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens produced a beneficial effect on the yield and quality parameters of tomato fruits with respect to the non-inoculated control: the number of fruits per plant (76%), fruit weight (36%), fruit size (50%), ascorbic acid (75%), and in the contents of N, P, and K in the fruit. Additionally, in a work on the inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens in pepper cultivation [ 25 ], the inoculant applied in the seedbed before transplant resulted in higher contents of protein, fat, Ca, and Fe with respect to the non-inoculated control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In a tomato biofertilization study, Yagmur and Gunes [ 15 ] reported that the single use of the strains B. megaterium , Paenibacillus polymxa , Burkholderia cepacia, and Azospirillum sp., increased the TSS, the electric conductivity, and the pH of tomato fruits. In a similar work, Gashash et al [ 37 ] reported that the co-inoculation of the strains B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens produced a beneficial effect on the yield and quality parameters of tomato fruits with respect to the non-inoculated control: the number of fruits per plant (76%), fruit weight (36%), fruit size (50%), ascorbic acid (75%), and in the contents of N, P, and K in the fruit. Additionally, in a work on the inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens in pepper cultivation [ 25 ], the inoculant applied in the seedbed before transplant resulted in higher contents of protein, fat, Ca, and Fe with respect to the non-inoculated control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Sterilization was employed to substantially reduce the diversity of rhizosphere microbes and delay the establishment of the rhizosphere microbiome, as maintaining sterilization in a greenhouse setting is unfeasible. However, other studies involving B. amyloliquefasciens and S. lycopersicum , wherein seed sterilization was omitted, have highlighted a positive impact of PGPR association on tomato traits, increasing the number of fruits per plant in both field conditions (Gashash et al, 2022) and greenhouse setups (Almaghrabi et al, 2013). This suggests that B. amyloliquefasciens can establish colonization within seeds even without the implementation of sterilization procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the percentage increase in number of fruits/plant was (16.77 and11.42%) in the bio-fertilization treatment compared to the treatment without biofertilization in the 1 st and 2 nd seasons. Gashash et al (2022) found that combined use of B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens increased the number of fruit plant -1 (by 76% compared to the control in the first season. Results found that mixed organic fertilization (C3) gave the highest number of fruit/plant (18.30 and 21.80) with increasing percentages (31.65 % and 43.42 %) compared to the other treatments in the 1 st and 2 nd season, respectively.…”
Section: Number Of Fruit/plantmentioning
confidence: 93%