2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04142-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of plant traits and their divergence on runoff and sediment retention in herbaceous vegetation

Abstract: AimsPlant species diversity impacts ecosystem processes, but its effects on runoff and soil erosion are not fully understood. Herbaceous vegetation control concentrated runoff and soil erosion through the increase of hydraulic roughness which leads to sediment retention. This study aims to investigate the effect of aboveground traits and their divergence (i.e., stem diameter and density, and leaf area and density) on hydraulic roughness and sediment retention in plant communities. MethodsRunoff experimentation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is consistent with results showing that the presence of functional types with larger stem diameters would influence the water path within a vegetation and, thus, displayed no effect of community functional diversity [15]. These findings are also coherent with primary results obtained on herbaceous vegetation, showing the negative influence of plants with low stem density, large diameters, and low leaf density, by reducing the hydraulic roughness and sediment retention within multi-specific communities [16]. The perspective is to study a gradient of functional structure, using a variation of abundances of large stem diameters, to confirm and show the idiosyncratic effects of functional diversity on water flow.…”
Section: Non-additive Effect Of the Functional Diversity On Hydraulicsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This hypothesis is consistent with results showing that the presence of functional types with larger stem diameters would influence the water path within a vegetation and, thus, displayed no effect of community functional diversity [15]. These findings are also coherent with primary results obtained on herbaceous vegetation, showing the negative influence of plants with low stem density, large diameters, and low leaf density, by reducing the hydraulic roughness and sediment retention within multi-specific communities [16]. The perspective is to study a gradient of functional structure, using a variation of abundances of large stem diameters, to confirm and show the idiosyncratic effects of functional diversity on water flow.…”
Section: Non-additive Effect Of the Functional Diversity On Hydraulicsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results emphasized the effects of the community-weighted trait of F. arundinacea on hydraulic roughness being the only species that was significantly different from the other communities, which would be led by the different CW leaf densities (0-20 cm and 0-10 cm), which is a major trait that is known to positively impact hydraulic roughness [26]. While similar effects of the dominance of community-weighted traits on soil retention have been observed in mixtures of different functional types [15] and herbaceous vegetation [16], additive effects of functional diversity on erosion rates were also shown [14]. These opposing effects of functional diversity on the hydraulic roughness and erosion rates could be explained by the idiosyncratic effects, which represent the contrasting effects of functional diversity affected by species and trait interactions, and soil-plant interactions.…”
Section: Non-additive Effect Of the Functional Diversity On Hydraulicmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The options for wood plants include teak [47,48], mahogany, and Indonesian rosewood, while the fruit crops include mangosteen, dog fruit, stink bean, jackfruit, lanzones/duku, and durian [49]. Besides, the intercrops that can be cultivated are coffee as a medium height plant [50][51][52] and herbs as root crops [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%