2001
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-79-6-949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of population reduction on home ranges of female white-tailed deer at high densities

Abstract: The relationship between deer density and home range size is important in assessing the effectiveness of deer reduction programs and predicting the effects of deer on habitat. We quantified annual home range and core area size and spatial configuration of adult female white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) exposed to a population reduction program and a control group exposed to no population reduction program over a 4-year period (1994)(1995)(1996)(1997). Deer were removed from Bluff Point during a 9-day s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our fine-scale analyses support female philopatry at the local level, suggesting a larger proportion of females remain philopatric. However, we found weak mtDNA differentiation and similar levels of male and female microsatellite differentiation at broad scales, even though male white-tailed deer are the predominant dispersers (Hawkins and Klimstra 1970;Nelson and Mech 1984;Aycrigg and Porter 1997;Kilpatrick et al 2001). There may be several reasons for this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Our fine-scale analyses support female philopatry at the local level, suggesting a larger proportion of females remain philopatric. However, we found weak mtDNA differentiation and similar levels of male and female microsatellite differentiation at broad scales, even though male white-tailed deer are the predominant dispersers (Hawkins and Klimstra 1970;Nelson and Mech 1984;Aycrigg and Porter 1997;Kilpatrick et al 2001). There may be several reasons for this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This lack of correlation supports our assumption that deer densities at these sites were not controlled by canopy disturbance or by the availability of understory vegetation during the time frame of this study. Hunting, topography, and the availability of agricultural crops are likely the most significant factors in determining local variation in deer densities in this study area (McNulty et al 1997, Kilpatrick et al 2001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have demonstrated inverse relationships between home-range size and population density for a range of species. This includes several predatory carnivores (Dahle and Swenson 2003;Marker and Dickman 2005;Benson et al 2006), primates (Glessner and Britt 2005), ungulates (Kilpatrick et al 2001;Kjellander et al 2004) and small mammals (Wolff 1985).…”
Section: Population Density and Potential Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%