2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pore-crack relative location on crack propagation in porous media using XFEM method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is possibly the reason why more pores (cavities) were formed in the specimen with rice husk particles of 1000 µm (see Figure 7c). These pores increased the possibility of crack formation in the resin matrix due to stress concentration, making it more prone to fail under compressive load [41], [42].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is possibly the reason why more pores (cavities) were formed in the specimen with rice husk particles of 1000 µm (see Figure 7c). These pores increased the possibility of crack formation in the resin matrix due to stress concentration, making it more prone to fail under compressive load [41], [42].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the XFEM was successfully applied to analyze fluid-structure interaction by modeling crack propagation under pressurized zones in porous media. Rezanezhad et al [78] also evaluated the XFEM on porous rocks, displaying the influence of pore size, orientation, and distance on crack propagation. Salimzadeh and Khalili [40] simulated fracking by a coupled hydro-poroelastic model, incorporating the injected fracturing fluid and the host fluids.…”
Section: Xfem and Porous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criterion allows crack propagation across the elements in a solution-dependent way: crack propagation occurs perpendicularly to the maximum principal stress, and the discontinuity allows the crack to change plane and direction during propagation. Therefore, the crack path growth is not pre-defined along a pre-selected direction [37][38][39]. Finite element analysis in the presence of continuum elements is based on the virtual work statement that considers Cauchy "true" stresses; therefore, the engineering UTS value is converted into the "true" UTS value [39] that is employed as MAXPS, i.e., 756 MPa in our case.…”
Section: Static Xfem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%