2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181732.37319.df
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation*

Abstract: Application of high PEEP does not impair intracranial pressure or regional cerebral blood flow per se but may indirectly affect cerebral perfusion via its negative effect on macrohemodynamic variables in case of a disturbed cerebrovascular autoregulation. Therefore, following severe subarachnoid hemorrhage, a PEEP-induced decrease of mean arterial pressure should be reversed to maintain cerebral perfusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
101
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
101
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, after a certain readjustment, or "buffering" period, ICP appeared to fall to previous levels despite hypercapnea, as long as PaCO 2 was stable. This reflects work previously showing ICP and PaCO 2 relationships in both animals and humans [3,10,14]. Another reasonable concern is the possible detrimental relationship between ICP and the sustained high mean airway pressures (mP aw ) necessary for HFOV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, after a certain readjustment, or "buffering" period, ICP appeared to fall to previous levels despite hypercapnea, as long as PaCO 2 was stable. This reflects work previously showing ICP and PaCO 2 relationships in both animals and humans [3,10,14]. Another reasonable concern is the possible detrimental relationship between ICP and the sustained high mean airway pressures (mP aw ) necessary for HFOV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Another reasonable concern is the possible detrimental relationship between ICP and the sustained high mean airway pressures (mP aw ) necessary for HFOV. There are numerous papers on the effect of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ICP, and it is common practice not to employ high levels of PEEP in patients with intracranial hypertension [4,7,10]. The sustained mean airway pressure used during HFOV may be viewed by some clinicians as high PEEP; however, we did not find any significant harmful effect of these pressures in our patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In an earlier study, high levels of PEEP were found to have an indirect effect on cerebral perfusion [4]. Luz et al [12] demonstrated that when PEEP was added to pneumoperitoneum, mean arterial pressure and cardiac output decreased more prominently than after pneumoperitoneum alone during laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The importance of PEEP application for maintaining adequate gas exchange while preventing ventilator-induced lung injury is especially emphasized (7,10,22,23). Many studies suggested that PEEP and the alveolar recruitment maneuver application improved ventilation-perfusion and gas exchange (7,24,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PEEP application causes a subsequent elevation of intrathoracic pressure, decreases cerebral venous return, increases intracranial blood volume and pressure, and possibly impairs cerebral blood flow. The effects of PEEP on ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) have been the focus of several experimental and clinical studies, but these studies did not address the direct relationship between ICP, cerebral blood flow, and PEEP during steep Trendelenburg position combined with pneumoperitoneum (8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%